Why Can't Scalars and Matrices Be Added in Pauli Matrix Calculations?

frerk
Messages
19
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Hey :-)
I just need some help for a short calculation.
I have to show, that
(\sigma \cdot a)(\sigma \cdot b) = (a \cdot b) + i \sigma \cdot (a \times b)

The Attempt at a Solution



I am quiet sure, that my mistake is on the right side, so I will show you my calculation for this one:
a_xb_x + a_yb_y+a_zb_z + i\sigma_x (a_yb_z - a_3b_2) + i\sigma_y (a_zb_x-a_xb_z) + i\sigma_z (a_xb_y -a_yb_x)

The last 3 terms are a 2x2 matrix and the first 3 terms are just a scalar...
So i can`t add them.

would be happy fora small hint what is wrong :-)
Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There is actually an identity matrix to be multiplied wit ##a\cdot b##.
 
blue_leaf77 said:
There is actually an identity matrix to be multiplied wit ##a\cdot b##.
hey. thank you for your answer.
Yes, right. that brings to to the result I want.
Is there a rule, why I have to multiply the result of the dot product with the idendity matrix?
Because the other terms include a Pauli Matrix and the result
of the dot produkt must adapt to that structure?
 
frerk said:
hey. thank you for your answer.
Yes, right. that brings to to the result I want.
Is there a rule, why I have to multiply the result of the dot product with the idendity matrix?
Because the other terms include a Pauli Matrix and the result
of the dot produkt must adapt to that structure?
Of course it can be proven using the more fundamental properties of Pauli matrices, especially their commutation and anti-commutation. An easy prove can be found here.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top