Why Can't We Calculate the Height of a Ball Thrown Up Without Air Resistance?

AI Thread Summary
Calculating the height of a ball thrown straight up without air resistance can be done using energy conservation principles, where the loss in kinetic energy equals the gain in potential energy. The formula for maximum height can be derived from the initial velocity and gravitational acceleration. However, when considering air resistance, factors like the ball's cross-sectional area and density become significant, as they affect the drag force experienced during ascent. The motion becomes more complex, requiring differential equations to account for the changing speed and the work done by air resistance. Ultimately, integrating these equations allows for a more accurate understanding of the ball's behavior under real-world conditions.
elissadi
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
If a 3 kg ball is thrown straight up at 40 m/s, using energy conservation, calculate how high the ball would go if there was no wind resistance.

I was told this could not be calculated. Is that true? and if so, why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
why not, loss in KE = gain in PE ?
 
What is the formula?
What if I added, let's say, a max. height like 75 m. Could energy lost, like due to friction with the air on the way up be calculated?
 
This can be done by looking at a symmetric problem. Assume the ball does decelerate to 0. Then by symmetry, solve the problem of how far it would have had to accelerate under gravity near the Earth's surface to get to 40 m/s, since assuming it loses no energy to air resistance this is the velocity it would return with to the person's hand.
If you want to add in air resistance, you have to account for the cross-sectional area of the ball (A), as a sheet of paper will fall slower than a crumpled up piece. Similarly, a styrofoam ball will encounter more resistance than a rubber ball, so density (d) is inversely proportional to the air resistance. Next, stick your hand out when you're walking. Compare it to sticking your hand out when you're running or in a car. Speed (v) is thus proportional to air resistance. We're insterested in the distance the ball will travel. m is the mass of the ball. So far we have the rudimentary 1-dimensional net force equation ma = mg - A*d*v. But v is not a constant, it is a function of time, so we have to solve the differential equation m*dv/dt = - mg - A*d*v for speed v or m*d2x/dt2 = - mg - A*d*dx/dt for distance x. This simple model has many more refinements placed on it based on the speed of the object and the type of resistance, but solving it will already allow you to see simple behavior like terminal velocity. :smile:
Since the energy lost by the ball is equivalent to the work done by the air resistance on the ball, you want to calculate the total work done by air resistance in the above equations, which would require integration, since the air resistance is also a function of time.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top