Why Did the Apollo LEMs Have a Four Leg Landing Gear?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Glenn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gear
AI Thread Summary
The Apollo Lunar Module (LEM) utilized a four-leg landing gear design primarily for stability and reliability. Initial concepts included a three-leg setup and even a five-leg configuration, but changes in the LEM's weight and center of gravity made these impractical. The four-legged design allowed for a larger gear diameter, which was necessary for safe landings on the lunar surface. Deployable legs were chosen to accommodate storage within the Saturn V adapter, making the design lighter and more efficient. Ultimately, the four-leg configuration provided the necessary support for various landing conditions.
Glenn
Why did the Apollo LEMs have a four leg landing gear instead of a three leg landing gear?

I saw some old photos of LEM concepts using a three gear setup and it got me wondering why they went to a heavier 4 gear setup.

Thanks,
Glenn
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I found this just snooping around:

"Apollo LEM landing gear design freeze:

MSC Director Robert R. Gilruth reported to the MSF Management Council that the LEM landing gear design freeze was now scheduled for August 31. Grumman had originally proposed a LEM configuration with five fixed legs, but LEM changes had made this concept impractical. The weight and overall height of the LEM had increased, the center of gravity had been moved upward, the LEM stability analysis had expanded to cover a wider range of landing conditions, the cruciform descent stage had been selected, and the interpretation of the lunar model had been revised. These changes necessitated a larger gear diameter than at first proposed. This, in turn, required deployable rather than fixed legs so the larger gear could be stored in the Saturn V adapter. MSC had therefore adopted a four-legged deployable gear, which was lighter and more reliable than the five-legged configuration."

This is from a site that appears to have a pretty good chronology of the design process:

http://www.astronautix.com/craft/lmlggear.htm

Hope this helps.
 
Pilot training is critical to safe flying. I watched the following video regarding the crash of TAM 402 (31 October 1996), which crashed into a Sao Paolo neighorbood about 25 seconds after takeoff. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TAM_Transportes_A%C3%A9reos_Regionais_Flight_402 The pilots were never trained to handle such an event (the airline had asked the manufacturer about training for this event), since it was considered too improbable (so rare) by the manufacturer. There was no...
Due to the constant never ending supply of "cool stuff" happening in Aerospace these days I'm creating this thread to consolidate posts every time something new comes along. Please feel free to add random information if its relevant. So to start things off here is the SpaceX Dragon launch coming up shortly, I'll be following up afterwards to see how it all goes. :smile: https://blogs.nasa.gov/spacex/

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
25
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
120
Replies
7
Views
571
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Back
Top