Why Do Accelerating Charges Generate Light?

Creebe
Messages
8
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Why do accelerating charges generate light, whereas charges with constant velocities do not.


Homework Equations


No equations.


The Attempt at a Solution


A accelerating charge affects the E field and B field?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Creebe said:

Homework Statement


Why do accelerating charges generate light, whereas charges with constant velocities do not.

Homework Equations


No equations.

The Attempt at a Solution


A accelerating charge affects the E field and B field?
I think you mean electro-magnetic radiation, not necessarily light.

If you are looking for a simple answer, it is because if you introduce a time-dependent electric field into Maxwell's equations, the solution is an equation for an electro-magnetic wave.

This does not explain, however, why a charge accelerating in a gravitational field does not produce an electromagnetic wave (according to General Relativity, such a charge is equivalent to a charge at rest in an inertial reference frame).

The key may be that that in order to produce an accelerating charge - other than by gravity- the charge has to interact with another charge somewhere in the universe (either through an em wave or an electric or magnetic field). So it may be the interaction with another charge that causes the resulting emission of radiation (and the acceleration).

The answer to this question, interestingly enough, is still not clear: See: http://www.mathpages.com/home/kmath528/kmath528.htm" .

AM
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top