Why Do Commutators Have Factors of 1/2?

Bravus
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Here's a link to an image of the exam question. It appears in the exam every couple of years, and it's due in my exam this coming week. I've looked in both the textbook and the course notes, and they simply *state* the conclusion, so I don't have a way of proving it, and in particular don't know where the factors of 1/2 come from.

http://www.bravus.com/commutators1.jpg

Homework Equations



See above.

The Attempt at a Solution



Here's an image of my attempts so far:

http://www.bravus.com/commutator2.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You have ##[X,Y]+\{X,Y\}=(XY-YX)+(XY+YX)=2XY##, right? See where the 1/2 comes from now?
 
Yep, that works, thanks! (As ever, it looks easy once someone explains!)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top