Why Do Different Methods of Loading Affect Spring Calculations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter confusseed
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confused Springs
AI Thread Summary
Different methods of loading a spring affect spring calculations due to the forces involved. When a mass is dropped onto a hanging spring, the gravitational force (mg) equates to the spring force (-kx) at rest, leading to the equation x = -mg/k for displacement. This explains why the potential energy equation PE = 1/2kx^2 is derived from the negative integral of the spring force. When gently lowering the mass, the spring does not experience the same dynamic forces, resulting in different calculations. Understanding these principles clarifies the discrepancies in outcomes based on loading methods.
confusseed
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
can someone explain to me how springs work?
I already know the equation of elastic pe= 1/2kx^2 but I need more explanation!
how come when a mass is dropped from a hanging spring I can multiply the mass by 9.8m/s^2 to get the force, then divide the answer by the spring's constant (20n/cm) then divide by two and get the right answer every time but when it is gently let down, I get the right answer without dividing by two and how come these methods do not work when the spring is on the ground and the mass is being dropped from a height?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your making me confused! I think you should try expressing yourslef more clearly, and people will be better equipted to help you!

Ok, for the P.E. I do not know how in-depth you go into this stuff. PE = -INT(F), that is, the potential energy is ALWAYS the negative integral of the force. Since the force for a spring is -kx, it is apparent where the PE equation comes from. We expect it to be positive all the time, because for all displacements (stretching of the spring) it must have a positive potential, as it stands to gain kinetic energy. Also note for x=o the potential is zeo, as we expect.

I think you want to find the displacement of a mass hanging on a spring. Well, first note that there are two forces acting on the mass. Gravitational force acting down, and th spring acting upwards. Therefore:
-kx = mg

mg is the force due to gravity, and -kx the force due to the spring. We equate them because when the block comes to rest, the forces must be equal.

Solving for x:
x = -mg/k

The negative sign just tells us it is displaced downwards.
I don't know what else you want.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top