Why do the upper and lower potions cancel the magnetic field?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on why the magnetic fields from the upper and lower portions of a solenoid cancel each other out, resulting in a weak external magnetic field. The Bio-Savart Law is referenced to analyze the contributions of current elements in the solenoid. It is noted that the direction of the magnetic field generated by the upper current elements is opposite to that of the lower ones at exterior points. This opposition leads to a reduction in the net magnetic field outside the solenoid. The explanation highlights the importance of considering the orientation and position of current elements in understanding magnetic field behavior.
anonymousphys
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Referring to the magnetic field in a solenoid:

"The field at exterior points is weak because the field due to current elements on the upper potions tends to cancel the field due to current elements on the lower portions"

Why do the upper and lower potions cancel the magnetic field?



Homework Equations



Bio-Savart Law

The Attempt at a Solution



This is suppose to to explain why the magnetic field outside a solenoid is zero, but I am not sure why. When I draw the components of the current creating the magnetic field outside a solenoid, they do not cancel out. Is my reasoning incorrect?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


In a coil, if the current in the upper current element on the top is going into the page, the field in the exterior point is towards right. The current in the lower current element is coming out of the page. The field due to this current element at the same exterior point is towards left. So the net field at that point is reduced.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top