Why Do We Neglect Short Circuit Current When Calculating CMOS Inverter Delay?

AI Thread Summary
When calculating the delay in a CMOS inverter, the short circuit current is often neglected because it occurs only briefly while both transistors conduct. This short duration current is limited by the inductance and resistance of the circuit path. The short circuit current flows through a potential divider formed by the complementary transistor pair, which does not significantly affect the output signal propagation. Any minor effects from this current can be accounted for by adjusting the RC parameters in the model. Therefore, the simplification of neglecting short circuit current is valid for delay calculations.
klen
Messages
40
Reaction score
1
When calculating delay, like the fall time delay of the output, through an inverter with rc model of the transistors (assuming Cmos inverter) why do we neglect the short circuit current through the device and what are the assumptions.

Can anyone explain this?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
By short circuit current I assume you are referring to the short period while both the upper and lower output drivers may be conducting at the same time. If it occurs, that short duration current is limited by the inductance and resistance of the path.

Any short circuit current is flowing through a potential divider comprising one complementary transistor pair. The signal is propagating perpendicular to the short circuit current and so is not effected. Any minor influence on the simple model will be taken into account by adjustment of the RC parameters.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
10K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Back
Top