Why do we perceive a limited number of hues in images?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Eh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vision
AI Thread Summary
Everyday images consist of numerous pixels with varying hues, but this diversity is often not noticeable until zoomed in. The brain interprets similar hues as the same due to the eye's resolution limitations. The process begins with light entering the eye, passing through various structures, and reaching photoreceptors that convert it into neural impulses. These impulses travel to the visual cortex, where the brain constructs the perception of sight. The concentration of rods and cones in the fovea allows for clearer vision and color detection, while peripheral areas have fewer rods, leading to a less detailed view. The blending of hues occurs naturally in the brain, similar to how a trained nose can distinguish subtle notes in a perfume that others might miss. Increased awareness and experience can enhance the ability to discern these hues.
Eh
Messages
745
Reaction score
0
A look at any image in photoshop reveals that everyday scenery consists of many pixels of different hues. Even in an image of the same basic colors, there appears to be hundreds of different hues of different brightness. However this great contrast is not apparent unless you zoom in on the image. For most visuals, there would appear to be only a handful of different hues in each object. IOW, those different hues that are apparently involved in the image look to be the same.

What is going on in the brain here? Are similar hues literally being interpreted as the same by the time the image is processed in the visual cortex?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
It rather has to do with the resolution of the eye. The fact that you ARE able to distinguish the different hues when you zoom in on an image gives away that fact :)
 
...a beam of frudroyant light fulminates in a conflagaration through the diaphonous cornea, impetuously invading the anteriour chamber and aqueous humor, abruptly storming the pupil and perforating the lumunous crystalline lens; the dithering light subsequently transverses the vitreous chamber anticipating its consumtion by the photoreceptors. These microscopual rods and cones synapsing with the bipolar cells ergo interchange of nuerons to thee gangolion cells where the impulses travel down the cells elongated axons, speeding in microsenconds, to the optic disk juxtaposed to the central artery and vein, all as quick and radiant as a sparkle of sunshine on a waves white cap on a summer eve. Absorbed through the optic nerve, yet not lackadaisical in spirit, the brevity and transcience of dichotomic nerves is cloven throughout the brain, puncturing conciousness, and rendering state, ending in the visual cortex of the cerebrum, creating the human's minds daydream of sight...

lol. that's what happens in your eye. I thought I'd add a little color to the textbook version. In fact the tiny rods that populate your eye, especially in your fovea, pick up the colors and blend them like a TV screen in your brain. RYBK or CMBK or whatever color blend you prefer. If you notice at night your eyes will switch to the cones which cannot view color and they are more grainy. notice at night your vision tends to fade to a rougher view.

AS TO YOUR QUESTION. The rods in your eye are focused mainly in the fovea, Which is the area the most light hits. The rods thin out as they get nearer to the blind spot. Ergo, what your looking at tends to be the clearest.

As to the fact you only notice a few hues or shades is because you don't pay attention. I used to think all the hues looked the same as a child but once I grew more developed into art they became more apparent.

It's like the fact you can't tell all the notes in a perfume by smelling it, but someone who works with perfumes all there life can.

Your brain blends the hues naturally, but you can couteract the effect.

WOW, this was a long response. lol
 
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...
Back
Top