Why Does a Rolling Sphere Climb Higher Than a Sliding Particle?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the physics problem of comparing the maximum heights reached by a rolling sphere and a sliding particle on an incline, both starting with the same initial speed. Using the conservation of energy principle, it is established that the maximum height attained by the sphere is 7/5 times that of the particle. The moment of inertia for the uniform sphere is given as I = (2/5)MR^2, which is crucial for calculating the energy distribution between translational and rotational forms. The masses of the objects are irrelevant in the final calculations as they cancel out.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of conservation of energy principles in physics
  • Familiarity with moment of inertia calculations, specifically I = (2/5)MR^2
  • Knowledge of translational and rotational kinetic energy concepts
  • Basic algebra for manipulating equations and solving for unknowns
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and implications of the moment of inertia for different shapes
  • Learn about the conservation of energy in rotational motion
  • Explore the differences between rolling motion and sliding motion in physics
  • Investigate real-world applications of rolling and sliding objects in mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics, as well as educators looking for examples of energy conservation in rolling versus sliding scenarios.

connorc234
Messages
14
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A uniform sphere and a particle are sent one-by-one with the same initial speed up the same incline. Each rises to a maximum height before falling back towards the starting point. The sphere rolls without slipping; the particle slides without friction. Use conservation of energy to show that the maximum height gained by the sphere is a factor 7/5 times that gained by the particle

Homework Equations


I = (2/5)MR^2

The Attempt at a Solution



In the first part of the question I'm asked to prove the moment of inertia for a hollow sphere and then a uniform sphere. I've done that and gotten the above equation for uniform sphere. But I don't know to apply it in this case. I'm not given any masses for either body. Any help?[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
connorc234 said:
I'm not given any masses for either body. Any help?
So plug in a (different) unknown for each mass and see where it goes. Just maybe the masses will cancel out later.
 
Like haruspex said, the masses don't matter, they'll cancel out. Keep in mind that the total initial energy possessed by the sphere will be comprised of rotational and translational kinetic energy.
 

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
978
  • · Replies 97 ·
4
Replies
97
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
4K