Why Does a Smaller Mass Reach the End of a Frictionless Track First?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

In a physics problem involving two objects with masses m and 4m pushed with equal forces on a frictionless track, the smaller mass (m) reaches the end first. This conclusion is derived from Newton's Second Law (F=ma), which indicates that acceleration is directly proportional to the applied force and inversely proportional to mass. Since both objects experience the same force, the smaller mass has a greater acceleration, resulting in a higher final velocity as it travels the same distance. The relationship between force, mass, and acceleration is crucial in understanding this outcome.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's Second Law (F=ma)
  • Basic knowledge of kinematics and velocity equations
  • Familiarity with concepts of force and mass
  • Comprehension of frictionless motion dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Newton's Second Law in various contexts
  • Learn about kinematic equations and their applications in motion
  • Explore the effects of friction on acceleration and velocity
  • Investigate real-world applications of frictionless motion in physics
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of motion and force dynamics.

Q7heng
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi, on my recent test there was a question stating 2 objects, one with a mass of m, and another with a mass of 4m, are pushed with equal forces on a frictionless track. The question asked which object will reach the end first and I said they will reach at the same time because there is no friction. But the right answer is the smaller mass will reach there first. I don't know how this works into everything in the equations of physics and how force, mass and velocity (not acceleration) is related. Help please!

Homework Equations


F=ma

Thanks a lot
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You know how force relates to mass and acceleration. Which mass will have the greater acceleration?
How does velocity depend on acceleration?
 
Shouldn't acceleration be 0 in this case because there is no friction on track?
 
Q7heng said:
Shouldn't acceleration be 0 in this case because there is no friction on track?
I have no idea why you would think that.
Acceleration results from a nonzero net force. If there is an applied force and nothing to oppose it then there will be acceleration.
Indeed, there is less likely to be acceleration when there is friction.
 
Q7heng said:
Shouldn't acceleration be 0 in this case because there is no friction on track?

That would be the case if they were coasting down the track. However the question as written in post #1 states they are being pushed down the track by a force.
 
∑Fx=ma (Newton's Second Law)

F(Push)=ma The only force acting in the direction of motion is the push.

We can also write Newton's second law for the y-direction, but it doesn't tell us anything. ∑Fy=N-mg=0 →N=mg.

Back to the x-direction, we found that a=F(Push)/m by solving Newton's second law in the x-direction for a.

Now we can use kinematics. Since distance is implicitly given, I would use the equation,

v2=2a(xf-xi)=2aΔx

So,

v=√2aΔx or v=√2(F/m)Δx

since m is on the bottom, for a given Δx (i.e. the length of the track) v gets larger as m gets smaller
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K