Why Does a Smaller Mass Reach the End of a Frictionless Track First?

AI Thread Summary
In the discussion, a question arises about two objects of different masses being pushed with equal forces on a frictionless track, leading to confusion about which will reach the end first. It is clarified that the smaller mass will reach the end first due to its greater acceleration, as acceleration is determined by the applied force divided by mass (F=ma). The presence of friction is irrelevant in this scenario since the objects are being actively pushed, resulting in a non-zero acceleration. The relationship between mass and velocity is explained, showing that as mass decreases, velocity increases for a given distance. Ultimately, the smaller mass accelerates faster and therefore reaches the end of the track first.
Q7heng
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi, on my recent test there was a question stating 2 objects, one with a mass of m, and another with a mass of 4m, are pushed with equal forces on a frictionless track. The question asked which object will reach the end first and I said they will reach at the same time because there is no friction. But the right answer is the smaller mass will reach there first. I don't know how this works into everything in the equations of physics and how force, mass and velocity (not acceleration) is related. Help please!

Homework Equations


F=ma

Thanks a lot
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You know how force relates to mass and acceleration. Which mass will have the greater acceleration?
How does velocity depend on acceleration?
 
Shouldn't acceleration be 0 in this case because there is no friction on track?
 
Q7heng said:
Shouldn't acceleration be 0 in this case because there is no friction on track?
I have no idea why you would think that.
Acceleration results from a nonzero net force. If there is an applied force and nothing to oppose it then there will be acceleration.
Indeed, there is less likely to be acceleration when there is friction.
 
Q7heng said:
Shouldn't acceleration be 0 in this case because there is no friction on track?

That would be the case if they were coasting down the track. However the question as written in post #1 states they are being pushed down the track by a force.
 
∑Fx=ma (Newton's Second Law)

F(Push)=ma The only force acting in the direction of motion is the push.

We can also write Newton's second law for the y-direction, but it doesn't tell us anything. ∑Fy=N-mg=0 →N=mg.

Back to the x-direction, we found that a=F(Push)/m by solving Newton's second law in the x-direction for a.

Now we can use kinematics. Since distance is implicitly given, I would use the equation,

v2=2a(xf-xi)=2aΔx

So,

v=√2aΔx or v=√2(F/m)Δx

since m is on the bottom, for a given Δx (i.e. the length of the track) v gets larger as m gets smaller
 

Thread 'Struggling to understand the concept of this question (ice cube in water optics question)'

TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
View full post »
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'

Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'

Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
View full post »

Similar threads

Why does mass not affect sliding speed down an inclined plane?
Replies
4
Views
908
How Does a Frictionless Ramp Affect Loot Crate Motion?
Replies
6
Views
2K
Center of mass and momentum- A question about systems
Replies
25
Views
1K
What are the forces on the center of mass?
Replies
7
Views
3K
Mass, acceleration and velocity
Replies
3
Views
2K
How to Apply Derivatives in Physics Problems?
Replies
9
Views
1K
Exploring Oscillatory Motion of Two Connected Masses on a Frictionless Track
Replies
3
Views
4K
Two spring-coupled masses in an electric field (one of the masses is charged)
Replies
1
Views
918
Dynamics of a Block on top of a slab with friction between them
Replies
33
Views
1K
Coefficient of Friction question for a cart going down a wooden ramp
Replies
18
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top