Why Does Adding an Opposite Point Charge Affect Electric Field Strength?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion regarding how adding an opposite point charge affects electric field strength. The student initially calculated the electric field strength at the midpoint between two charges, concluding it should increase when an opposite charge is added. However, the correct interpretation is that while the fields from both charges do add, the distance to each charge from the midpoint is critical, being half the total separation. The consensus is that the student's calculations are correct, and the field strength should indeed increase, contrary to the exam solution. Overall, the addition of an opposite charge does not decrease the field strength at the midpoint.
Millsworth
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I am having difficulty explaining this question to my student.

l.jpg


His solution to part ii was (taking r to be the distance between the point charges) E = 2(kQ/(r/2)^2 due to the fact that you are measuring the field strength half way between the point charges.

So, E = 2 x (9E9 x 1.6E-19/(1E-10)^2) = 2.9E11 N/C

The solution given is

l.jpg


This is the solution that is also given in the revision guide.

He cannot understand why adding an opposite point charge which provides a force in the same direction would mean the field strength goes down.


I can't give him an answer that satisfies. Can anyone help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Millsworth said:
He cannot understand why adding an opposite point charge which provides a force in the same direction would mean the field strength goes down.

The field strength at that point will go up, not down. (compared to the field strength at that point if only the positive charge was present.) Also, the distance from each charge to the point directly between them is 1*10^-10m not 2*10^-10m.

If I am reading the question correctly, I agree with your students answer:

There are two charges: Q_1=1.6\times10^{-19}C Q_2=-1.6\times10^{-19} separated by 2*10^-10m.

Therefore the point halfway between them is located 1*10^-10m away from each charge. Therefore r_1=r_2=r=1\times10^{-10}.

The fields from each charge point in the same direction, so they add:

E=E_1+E_2=KQ_1/r_1^2 +KQ_2/r_2^2= \frac{2KQ}{r^2}
 
Last edited:
Thank you for your swift response

Are you saying that you think the exam solution is wrong?

Is my students answer correct?
Should the solution to ii be 2(kQ/(r/2)^2?
 
If only the positive charge was present E = 1.4x10^11 N/C

If opposite charge is added, OCR say E = 7.2X10^10 N/C
 
Millsworth said:
Is my students answer correct?
Should the solution to ii be 2(kQ/(r/2)^2?

Yes.

I've edited my above response to show my reasoning. Sorry it took so long. I had problems with LaTeX.
 
Last edited:
Millsworth said:
If only the positive charge was present E = 1.4x10^11 N/C

This is correct.
If opposite charge is added, OCR say E = 7.2X10^10 N/C

This is wrong. Think about it. We are looking for the field at the center point. So, how far away from the center point is each charge? That is r.

r \not= 2\times10^{-10}

r=1\times10^{-10}
 
Last edited:
If you label the separation of A and B as r, then the field midway between them is:

E=\frac{kq_A}{(\frac{r}{2})^2} + \frac{kq_B}{(\frac{r}{2})^2}

Since qA=-qB, I'll call the magnitude of their charge q:

E=\frac{kq}{(\frac{r}{2})^2} - \frac{-kq}{(\frac{r}{2})^2} = \frac{2kq}{(\frac{r}{2})^2}Using the given values of q and r:

E= \frac{2kq}{(\frac{r}{2})^2} = \frac{2(9\times 10^9~Nm^2C^{-2})(1.6\times 10^{-19}~C)}{(1\times 10^{-10}~ m)^2}=2.88\times 10^{11}~N/CSo your student was correct.
 
Back
Top