Why Does Calculating Maximum Height in Hooke's Law Give a Negative Value?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jon1NL8796
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hooke's law Law
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the maximum height a mass rises when released from a spring's potential energy. Initially, the user calculated the work done on the spring and the maximum speed of the mass using Hooke's Law and energy conservation principles. The confusion arose when attempting to find the maximum height, resulting in a negative value due to incorrect energy balance assumptions. After clarifying that the total energy remains constant in a frictionless environment, the user correctly equated the elastic potential energy to gravitational potential energy. Ultimately, the maximum height was determined to be approximately 1.98 meters.
Jon1NL8796
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey there everyone. First post, so... yeah.

Anywho, I got a few questions on Hooke's law as a homework assignment. But the last one is giving me some trouble. I'll tell what I've done so far that leads up to the problem.

The first question asks to calculate the work done given a Graphical Analysis graph that has force on the y-axis and the elongation of a spring on the x-axis (N/m). I figured out that this would be equal to the area of under the given best fit line, so it was a simple case of using the equation K=(.5)bh, where b is th longest elongation (.084) and h is the corresponding force (5.886). So the equation looks like:

Work = K = (.5)(.084)(5.886)
= .247 J

The next question is to find the maximum speed of the spring when a 150 gram mass is attatched to the end, the spring is stretched to its maximum distance, and then released. I know this dealt with PE elastic and KE. so the equation was:

PE elastic(i) + KE(i) = PE elastic(f) + KE(f)

And since there was no KE initially or PE elastic in the final effect:

PE elastic = KE

So then:

PE elastic = (0.5)kx^2
= (0.5)(69.51)(0.084)^2
= 0.245 J
PE elastic = KE = (0.5)mV^2
0.245 = (0.5)(0.15)V^2
V^2 = 0.245 / ([0.5][0.15])
= 3.27
V = 1.81 m/s

Now here's the final question, which is giving me so much trouble. If the setup from the previous question is rigged to be released vertically at the instant that all of the PE in the spring is transferred to the mass, what will the maximum height the mass rises to be?

I thought that since it involved PEg, PE elastic, and KE, and because there would initially be no KE or PEg or PE elastic in the final result, the equation would look like:

(.5)kx^2 = (.5)mV^2 + mgh

Yet no matter how many times I try to get it to work, I always get h to equal a negative number in the ten-thousanths place. I need help with this desperately, and any assistance given would be greatly appreciated.

Peace out y'all!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Initial (at bottom, call h=0):
KE = 0 (not moving)
PEg =0 (h=0)
PEelast=max (x is maximum and equal to h)

Final (at top):
KE=0 (not moving)
PEg =maximum
PEelast= 0 (you can set the "x" to an arbitrary 0, just like "h")

NOw you assume that the total energy of the system remaons constant, and is still equal to what it was before. How much energy was there?
 
Last edited:
Thanks for that, I see how I went wrong and fixed the problem.

The questions are supposed to take place in a frictionless enviorment, so there would be no energy loss between the initial and the final. And seeing as the new equation is PE elastic = PEg, and I had already found PE elastic to be .245 J, PEg would be equal to .245 J.

So the steps for the final question looked like this:

.245 = PEg = mgh
= (.15)(9.81)h
h = .245 / ([.15][9.81])
= 1.98 m

Thanks again Chi!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top