Why Does the Cosine Term Disappear in the Lorentz Force Calculation?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the Lorentz force calculation and the apparent disappearance of the cosine term in the dot product during the derivation of kinetic energy change. It highlights that magnetic fields do not perform work on moving particles; they only alter their direction. The confusion arises from a step in the mathematical explanation where the cosine term is seemingly omitted, leading to questions about its validity. Clarification is provided that the dot product of a vector with itself results in zero change in kinetic energy, as the velocity vector's magnitude does not change direction. Ultimately, the cosine term is not needed in this context, as the kinetic energy remains constant when only magnetic forces are acting.
Je m'appelle
Messages
117
Reaction score
0
It is known that magnetic fields do no work at a moving particle, all they can do is to change the particle's direction.

So, I've been trying to understand a step on the mathematical explanation, but I'm stuck.

I'm using this source: http://www.tutorvista.com/content/physics/physics-iv/moving-charges-magnetism/lorentz-force.php

What I don't get is the step below

m \frac{d}{dt} (v \cdot v) = m(v} \cdot \frac{d v}{dt} + \frac{d v}{dt} \cdot v) = 2m v\frac{d v}{dt}

Shouldn't it be

2m v \cdot \frac{d v}{dt} = 2m v \frac{d v}{dt} cos \theta

What happened to the cosine? The dot product simply disappeared, it's like he considered cos \theta = 1, but as far as I understood it, the cosine is actually zero and not one.

OBS: 'v' is a vector.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
your latex image seems to be invalid and I can't view it
 
The legend said:
your latex image seems to be invalid and I can't view it

I've fixed it already, somehow the vector function in the latex wasn't working.
 
It looks like a typo to me. He does it correctly the first time when he says

m\frac{d\vec{v}}{dt}\cdot \vec{v}=\frac{m}{2}\frac{d}{dt}(\vec{v} \cdot \vec{v})=0

Now \vec{v} \cdot \vec{v}=v^2 so it follows that the change in kinetic energy is zero.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top