Why Does the Shuttle-Ball Experiment Graph Show Only Straight Lines?

  • Thread starter Thread starter superconduct
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Experiment
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding why the Shuttle-Ball Experiment graph displays straight lines rather than concave upward slopes. It clarifies that the relationship between electric potential energy and distance is linear when dealing with a point charge between parallel plates, as the electric field in this scenario is nearly uniform. This uniform electric field results in a constant force acting on the ball, leading to work done that varies linearly with distance. The participants confirm that the inverse proportionality relation applies differently in this context compared to point charges. Overall, the linearity of the graph is attributed to the consistent electric field between the plates.
superconduct
Messages
31
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



20130322_192604.jpg



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



By the inverse proportionality relation between electric potential energy and distance, why is the graph composed of straight lines only but not concave upwards slopes? My sketch and the solution are attached below.
 

Attachments

  • problem.jpg
    problem.jpg
    41.3 KB · Views: 549
  • attempt.jpg
    attempt.jpg
    29.4 KB · Views: 507
  • solution.jpg
    solution.jpg
    42.1 KB · Views: 515
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
superconduct said:
By the inverse proportionality relation between electric potential energy and distance, why is the graph composed of straight lines only but not concave upwards slopes?

When you say "inverse proportionality" between U and distance, are you thinking of U = kq1q2/r? That formula is for the potential energy of two point charges. But the problem deals with a point charge between parallel plates.
 
yeah I was thinking of that.
So the relation when in parallel plates is linear? Why??
 
Can you describe the properties of the electric field between the plates?
 
the electric field is nearly uniform and varies linearly across the plates?
 
superconduct said:
the electric field is nearly uniform and varies linearly across the plates?

E is (nearly) uniform, which means that it essentially doesn't vary at all as you move from one plate to the other. So, what can you conclude about the force acting on the ball as it moves between the plates?
 
The force is constant and work done varies linearly with distance?
 
superconduct said:
The force is constant and work done varies linearly with distance?

Yes, that's right.
 
thanks a lot for clearing my concepts :)
 
Back
Top