Why Does the System Have a Zero Frequency in the Normal Mode Oscillations?

deadringer
Messages
32
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two equal masses are connected by two massless springs of constant k and nat. length l. The masses are constrained by a frictionless tube on a pivot, (also massless) so that they remain colinear with the pivot. The pivot subtends angle theta with the vertical. The 1st mass is at distance r1 from the pivot (therefore the 1st spring has length r1) and the second mass is at r2 from the pivot.
We need to find the normal mode frequencies of oscillation about stable equil.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I have found the Lagrangian, equations of motion, equilibrium point and normal mode frequencies. The only problem is that I get one frequency of zero, and I don't understand physically what is going on (this is not an oscillating solution but a constant solution). This appears to imply that the system is displaced from equilibrium and just stays at the new position (i.d does not oscillate about equil. or diverge from equil.), although physically this seems not to make sense.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would think that the zero frequency solution is just for when there is no initial displacement.
 
The zero frequency comes from displacement of the center of mass.
In 3D you get 6 zero frequencies corresponding to 3 displacements of the C.O.M and 3 rotations about the C.O.M.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top