Why Does Unpolarized Light Lose Half Its Intensity Through a Polaroid?

AI Thread Summary
Unpolarized light loses half its intensity when passing through a Polaroid due to the equal likelihood of light components aligning with the filter direction or being perpendicular to it. This results in a factor of 0.5 for the transmitted intensity. The angle of 30 degrees between the first filter (12 o'clock) and the second filter (1 o'clock) is derived from the geometric positioning of these angles, with 1 o'clock being one-third of the way from 12 to 3 o'clock, which is 90 degrees. The intensity of the light after passing through both filters can be calculated using the equation I = I0 * 0.5 * cos²(30). Understanding these principles helps clarify the behavior of light through polarizing filters.
superslow991
Messages
78
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Unpolarized light of intensity Io passed through a Polaroid sheet with its polarizing axis at the 12 o'clock position and then through a second with its polarizing axis at the 1 o'clock position. What is the intensity of the emerging light?

Homework Equations


[/B]
I= I0 *0.5*cos2(30)

The Attempt at a Solution


Now i know the solution i just want a break down of the question. Why is it that when a unpolarized light passed through a polaroid, it loses 1/2 its intensity?

Also where would the 30 degrees come from? Also is it possible to draw this question out?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Intuitively, the factor of 0.5 is because the unpolarized light is exactly as likely to have components aligned with the filter direction as at right angles. So half the light intensity gets through. You can probably do a little trig and calculus to calculate the 0.5. The cos(30) is due to the angle between the first filter at 12 o'clock and the second filter at 1 o'clock.
 
  • Like
Likes superslow991
FactChecker said:
Intuitively, the factor of 0.5 is because the unpolarized light is exactly as likely to have components aligned with the filter direction as at right angles. So half the light intensity gets through. You can probably do a little trig and calculus to calculate the 0.5. The cos(30) is due to the angle between the first filter at 12 o'clock and the second filter at 1 o'clock.

Hmm how can you be sure that the angle between the 12 o clock filter and 1 o clock filter is 30 degrees though?
 
superslow991 said:
Hmm how can you be sure that the angle between the 12 o clock filter and 1 o clock filter is 30 degrees though?
12 o'clock is straight up and 3 o'clock is horizontal so that is 90°. So 1 o'clock is 1/3 * 90° = 30°
 
  • Like
Likes superslow991
FactChecker said:
12 o'clock is straight up and 3 o'clock is horizontal so that is 90°. So 1 o'clock is 1/3 * 90° = 30°
ok thanks a lot
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top