Why doesn't a fluorescent lamp implode and shatter ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hurricane939
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lamp
AI Thread Summary
Fluorescent lamps maintain a low internal pressure of 0.3% of atmospheric pressure, creating a pressure difference that is not sufficient to shatter the glass. The strength of the lamp's tubular shape, akin to arches, provides greater resistance to pressure compared to flat surfaces like windows. If the lamp were rectangular, it would be more susceptible to shattering unless the glass was significantly thick. This principle of using curved surfaces for vacuum vessels is widely applicable in various technologies, including CRTs and dewar flasks. The design of fluorescent lamps effectively prevents implosion despite the pressure differential.
Hurricane939
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Accoring to Wikipedia, the pressure inside a fluorescent lamp is 0.3% of the atmospheric pressure, so the pressure difference between the outside and the inside of the lamp is almost equal to the atmospheric pressure which is 1 bar or 14.7 psi.

Now according to this and this, glass shatters at an overpressure of about 1 psi, and sometimes even less than that.

So why doesn't the difference in pressure between the outside and the inside of a fluorescent lamp cause the glass to shatter ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The article is referring to windows, which are flat. Arches (tubes)are much stronger.
 
russ_watters said:
The article is referring to windows, which are flat. Arches (tubes)are much stronger.
So if the lamp shape was rectangular for example, would it shatter ?
 
Hurricane939 said:
So if the lamp shape was rectangular for example, would it shatter ?
Yes; unless the glass was very thick. The principle of using curved surfaces for vacuum vessels is pretty universal. CRTs, radio valves, dewar flasks . . . . .
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?
Back
Top