Why Gauss's law works when charge enclosed is not uniform?

AI Thread Summary
Gauss's law can be applied to find the electric field outside a non-uniform charge distribution, as it calculates the total electric flux through a closed surface without requiring uniformity in the charge distribution. The electric field does not need to be uniform, and the law remains valid regardless of the charge distribution inside the slab. The discussion clarifies that the electric field can vary across different points, but Gauss's law still provides a correct calculation of the electric field based on the net flux. Sufficient symmetry in the problem may allow for determining the electric field at specific locations. Understanding these principles is essential for applying Gauss's law effectively in complex scenarios.
Jae
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
This problem has charge that is not uniform in the inside, but it is still possible to find the electric field as a function of distance outside the slab using Gauss's law. How is this possible if the electric field is not uniform in the slab and plane? Wouldn't the electric field from the middle of the slab to the a x-distance d be different on both sides?

Once I did Gauss's law I got a correct solution of
(sigma + row_E) / 2(epsilon naught)

phyQuestion.JPG


Thank you for answering this question.

Mentor's Note: Thread moved to Advanced Physics Homework from another forum, hence the lack of a template.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
This problem has charge that is not uniform in the inside, but it is still possible to find the electric field as a function of distance outside the slab using Gauss's law. How is this possible if the electric field is not uniform in the slab and plane?
Gauss law has no restriction to uniform charge distributions. The electric field found doesn't have to be uniform either. Why do you think it would have to be ?

Wouldn't the electric field from the middle of the slab to the a x-distance d be different on both sides?
What do you mean with "the electric field from the middle of the slab to the a x-distance d" ?
 
BvU said:
Gauss law has no restriction to uniform charge distributions. The electric field found doesn't have to be uniform either. Why do you think it would have to be ?

What do you mean with "the electric field from the middle of the slab to the a x-distance d" ?
If Gauss's law calculates the net electric flux. I don't understand how it's possible that calculating the electric field if the surface does not have a uniform field.
I made a typo. I mean to say the x-direction from the middle of the slab. Sorry.

Thank you for helping.
 
Jae said:
If Gauss's law calculates the net electric flux. I don't understand how it's possible that calculating the electric field if the surface does not have a uniform field.
I made a typo. I mean to say the x-direction from the middle of the slab. Sorry.

Thank you for helping.
Gauss's Law only finds the total flux through a closed surface.

If there is sufficient symmetry present, then it may be possible to determine the electric field on some portion of the surface.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top