Why is Clapeyron Equation Positive for Most Materials?

  • Thread starter Thread starter asdf1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Clapeyron
asdf1
Messages
734
Reaction score
0
why's it positive for most materials?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure exactly what you mean. The equation says, for a phase transition:
\frac{dP}{dT}=\frac{\Delta H}{T\Delta V}
I think you're talking about dP/dT, but correct me if I'm wrong. Suppose you have a liquid that is being converted into a gas. This process is endothermic so \Delta H>0 and since the volume of the gas is greater than that of the liquid \Delta V>0. Since the LHS has all positive terms, then \frac{dP}{dT}>0. If you go in reverse and condense a gas then both \Delta H and \Delta V change sign so the RHS remains positive.

If you want to know if it is positive for most substances, you have to think of it as "are delta H and delta V the same sign for most substances and most phase transitions". There are exceptions, like the liquid-solid transition of water, but think about most substances and the answer will come to you.
 
thank you very much! :)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top