Why Is dz/dt Negative in Cosmology?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sirius24
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Change Negative
Sirius24
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I am working with cosmology and expansion.
Obtain dz/dt as a function of z and H_o only. What is the sign for dz/dt and why?
z is the redshift and H_o is the Hubble constant.

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution



So I found the equation for dz/dt = (1+z)H_o[1-(1+z)^(3/2)] based on previous sections of this problem. I can see that for z>0, dz/dt is negative. I also have a graph that confirms this. I don't understand why this is true physically.

Why is dz/dt negative?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If I recall correctly, that's because the model you're using is actually decelerating, which means that the redshift will be decreasing with time, making \frac{dz}{dt} negative.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top