Why is eta meson decay into 3 neutral pions forbidden?

lLehner95
Messages
7
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Explain why eta meson can't decay into 3 neutral pions. Use isospin and pions statistics.
Relevant Equations
`##|\eta >=|I=0,I_{z}=0>## and ##|\pi ^{0} >=|1,0>##
I started combining 2 pions:
##|\pi ^{0},\pi ^{0} >=\sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}|2,0>-\sqrt{\frac{1}{3}}|0,0>##
What should i do now? Should i continue combining the third pion or can i already say that it's forbidden? If yes, why? Is it because the state antisymmetric, impossible for two bosons?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lLehner95 said:
Homework Statement: Explain why eta meson can't decay into 3 neutral pions. Use isospin and pions statistics.
Homework Equations: `##|\eta >=|I=0,I_{z}=0>## and ##|\pi ^{0} >=|1,0>##

I started combining 2 pions:
##|\pi ^{0},\pi ^{0} >=\sqrt{\frac{2}{3}}|2,0>-\sqrt{\frac{1}{3}}|0,0>##
What should i do now? Should i continue combining the third pion or can i already say that it's forbidden? If yes, why? Is it because the state antisymmetric, impossible for two bosons?

One way to tell it is forbidden is using G-parity conservation.

The eta meson has G-parity 1, so it can only decay to something whose total G-parity is 1. Each pion has G-parity of -1. Since the G-parity of a system of two or more particles is just the product of the G-parity of each of these particles (it is multiplicative), we conclude that the eta meson cannot decay to an odd number of pions.

You can read more about G-parity here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G-parity.
 
Thank you! However, we haven't studied G-parity yet, and our teacher wants us to solve the problem using isospin and boson statistics.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top