Why is the Answer C? Electric Field in Conductors

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion regarding the answer to a question about electric fields in conductors, specifically why the correct answer is C despite the common understanding that the electric field inside a conductor is zero. Participants clarify that while the net electric field at a point inside the conductor is indeed zero, the field due to surface charges is not. There is uncertainty about determining the direction of the electric field without knowing the sign of charge Q, leading to further debate on whether assumptions can be made. Some argue that the question should not rely on assumptions about the charge sign, advocating for clearer communication from the professor. The conversation highlights the importance of precise information in physics problems.
SmartAries
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
A particle with charge Q is placed outside a large neutral conducting sheet. At any point in the interior of the sheet, the electric field produced by charges on the surface is directed:

A. toward the surface
B. away from the surface
C. toward Q
D. away from Q
E. none of the above
Relevant Equations
(Conceptual)
The answer according to the key is C. I thought the answer would be E since the electric field inside a conductor is always zero. Can someone explain why the answer is C?
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2020-02-16 at 4.42.45 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2020-02-16 at 4.42.45 PM.png
    14.3 KB · Views: 339
Physics news on Phys.org
The net electric field at a point P inside the conductor will be zero. But, the field due to the charge on the surface of the sheet will not be zero at P.
 
TSny said:
The net electric field at a point P inside the conductor will be zero. But, the field due to the charge on the surface of the sheet will not be zero at P.

Ah, I see. How do we get an indication of the direction of the field if we are not given the sign of charge Q?
 
SmartAries said:
How do we get an indication of the direction of the field if we are not given the sign of charge Q?
Good question. Without knowing the sign of Q there is not a definite answer to the question.
If I had to make a choice, I would assume Q is positive.
 
  • Like
Likes PhDeezNutz
SmartAries said:
Ah, I see. How do we get an indication of the direction of the field if we are not given the sign of charge Q?

Criminal. The correct answers for both signs are among the multiple choice answers. Getting a correct answer should not depend on you reading the professor’s mind correctly. Complain vociferously and don’t let him/her weasel out with some lame excuse like “Well, obviously if I don’t state the sign it’s positive.”
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top