Why is the electric field inside a conductor zero?

AI Thread Summary
In static equilibrium, the electric field inside a conductor is zero because free-moving charges within the conductor redistribute themselves to cancel any internal electric field. If an electric field were present, it would cause the charges to move until they reach a state where the field is neutralized. Consequently, any excess charge accumulates on the surface of the conductor. This principle is similar to how gravitational forces behave within a sphere, where forces from different sections cancel each other out. Thus, the absence of an electric field inside a conductor is a fundamental characteristic of electrostatics.
Timebomb3750
Messages
59
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Why is the electric field, in static equilibrium, equal to zero.

The Attempt at a Solution



The only way I can see why is to picture that there was an electric field inside a conductor. The field would cause the electrons to move freely inside the conductor. This movement of electrons would cancel out the electric field.

That's my two cents. I'm sure I could expand on this more, but I'm confused because I'm having a really hard time trying to picture this in my head.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can also show this the same way you show that the gravitational force inside a sphere is 0. Given a point, P, inside the sphere, take a small section of surface area on the surface of the sphere and draw a line from every point in that section through P to the other side of the sphere. Note that the area will be directly proportional to the square of the distance from P and since the force is inversely proportional to the square of the distance, the force from the two sections cancel.
 
Timebomb3750 said:

Homework Statement


Why is the electric field, in static equilibrium, equal to zero.

The Attempt at a Solution



The only way I can see why is to picture that there was an electric field inside a conductor. The field would cause the electrons to move freely inside the conductor. This movement of electrons would cancel out the electric field.

That's my two cents. I'm sure I could expand on this more, but I'm confused because I'm having a really hard time trying to picture this in my head.
Yes, that's the basic idea.

In a conductor charge is (relatively) free to move. If there were an electric field within a conductor, charges would move. They would move in such a way and to such locations so as to cancel that field.

As a result, any excess local charge can only reside on the surface of a conductor under conditions of equilibrium.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top