Why is the equivalent force-couple system at corner D needed?

jaredmt
Messages
120
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 63lb force F and 560lb in couple M are applied to corner A of the block shown. Replace the given force-couple system with an equivalent force-couple system at corner D

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


I actually solved the problem but I had to guess and check. I am not sure why it works the way it worked so I was hoping somebody could explain this to me.

First i found the components of M. then I found the components of the Moment created by F by doing A X F. I called this M1
Then I put the same force at point D and did D X F giving me M2

in order to find the answer I had to do M - M1 + M2. Can someone explain why I had to do M - M1 + M2?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you show the diagram?

The total torque (and total force) should be the same in both cases.
 
I don't have a way of getting a good picture of it. but i can give u this info if it helps:
A (0,7.2,4.8)
D (14.4,0,0)
F = <54,27.1,-18>
M (@ point A) = <448,-336,0>
M1 = AXF = <-259.7,259.2,-388.8>
M2 = DXF = <0,259,390.24>
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top