Why is the height of point 2 same as point 3?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the observation that the height of point 2 is the same as point 3 in a turbine setup, attributed to the small height differences within the turbine. It raises the question of whether this equality is an assumption due to the minimal height variations. The conversation also notes that different types of turbines are employed for smaller height differences. Additionally, there is curiosity about the absence of the approximation symbol "≈" in the context. Overall, the dialogue explores the implications of small height differences in turbine design.
EastWindBreaks
Messages
128
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


upload_2017-10-27_4-15-19.png

Homework Equations


upload_2017-10-27_4-15-40.png


The Attempt at a Solution


Is it an assumption because the difference in height is small?
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-10-27_4-15-19.png
    upload_2017-10-27_4-15-19.png
    17.8 KB · Views: 762
  • upload_2017-10-27_4-15-40.png
    upload_2017-10-27_4-15-40.png
    2.6 KB · Views: 665
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
With a setup as shown height differences within the turbine are very small.
For smaller height differences, other types of turbines are used.
 
  • Like
Likes EastWindBreaks
I wonder why it didnt use "≈", thank you!
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Find Projectile Flight Time Given Only Maximum Height
Replies
4
Views
2K
Height above the Galactic Plane
Replies
2
Views
2K
Compute the angle θ that will maximize the height of h of the impact point
Replies
8
Views
5K
Swinging Tarzan: Solving for Maximum Height & Angle
Replies
3
Views
2K
Find the difference of heights of the objects
Replies
5
Views
2K
Calculate the height of a water column and expressions for P
Replies
16
Views
6K
Pressure at same height in same fluid?
Replies
4
Views
3K
Height of a projectile at two points?
Replies
5
Views
1K
Projectile Motion with Unknown Initial Height
Replies
7
Views
3K
Calculating Initial Height of a Falling Safe on a Spring
Replies
5
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top