Why is the work done counted twice in the 1st law of thermodynamics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter curious bishal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law Thermodynamics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the application of the first law of thermodynamics, specifically regarding the relationship between heat supplied to a system and the work done by that system. The initial energy of the system is denoted as E1, and when heat q is added, the energy is expected to change to E2. The confusion arises from the perception that work w is being counted twice in the energy equation E2 = E1 + q + w. Clarification is provided that work w should be viewed as the work done by the system, which results in a decrease in the system's energy. Therefore, the correct formulation is E2 = E1 + q - w, indicating that while heat is added, the work performed by the system reduces its energy. The net energy change is expressed as q - w, emphasizing that the heat added and the work done are distinct contributions to the energy balance, resolving the concern of double counting.
curious bishal
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
On the way to prove 1st law of thermodynamics, you consider a system having initial energy E1. Then, you supply heat q to the system. Some part of the applied heat is used for doing work.
Then, again you consider the final energy (E2) of the system to be:
E2=E1+q+w
where w is the work done.

We all very well know that the work is done by the heat applied. If we add both heat applied and work done to the final energy, isn't the work done counted twice. I mean to say that the heat energy wasted in the work done is also consisted in q so why is there need to add w in the final energy E2.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
I think the confusion here comes from whether w is the work done on the system, or the work done by the system. These change the energy by opposite amounts.

If the system is doing work w, the energy of the system decreases by w, so

E2=E1+q-w

Then, if q=w,
E2=E1
 
jfizzix said:
I think the confusion here comes from whether w is the work done on the system, or the work done by the system. These change the energy by opposite amounts.

If the system is doing work w, the energy of the system decreases by w, so

E2=E1+q-w

Then, if q=w,
E2=E1
It doesn't give the solution to my problem. Why is the work done counted double?
 
The work is not double-counted.

If the system starts at energy E1, and you add heat q to it, the energy has changed to amount E1'= E1+q.

If the system then performs work w on its environment, it loses w units of energy, so its energy changes to E2 = E1'-w = E1+q-w.

Though some of the heat is converted into work, that doesn't affect the fact that q units of heat were added, and w units of work are extracted. Thus the net energy change is q-w.
 
I want to test a humidity sensor with one or more saturated salt solutions. The table salt that I have on hand contains one of two anticaking agents, calcium silicate or sodium aluminosilicate. Will the presence of either of these additives (or iodine for that matter) significantly affect the equilibrium humidity? I searched and all the how-to-do-it guides did not address this question. One research paper I found reported that at 1.5% w/w calcium silicate increased the deliquescent point by...
Back
Top