Why is the zenith angle distribution of the muons cos2(x) ?

phys_student1
Messages
104
Reaction score
0
Hello,

Empirically, the flux distribution of cosmic ray muons follow cos^2(θ) where θ is angle of incidence. Looking up the papers, I did not find any clue as to why is this the case. All sources simply consider this an experimental fact.

Is their any real explanation for this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That is a common question and I never saw a good answer. It is probably just some function which is not so far away from the real distribution, without a deeper physical argument behind it.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
First of all consider that the Earth's atmosphere is a perfect sphere.
The path length for θ=0 is the minimum possible.
Also note that there no chance to detect a muon for θ=π/2(for this specific angle the muon would have to travel along the Earth's crust, it would collide and interact with the crust's atoms with a very high probability).

Those arguments state that we need a cos-like distribution.

The next step is to think that the muon obeys the Bethe-Bloch formula. In simple words the energy loss per unit length, is something like 1/β^2...

This implies that it is very much likely to observe a muon for small θ(where the path length is minimum) rather that large θ, in a non-linear way.

If you also put in mind that the Earth's atmosphere isn't a perfect sphere, but it's a "3D ellipsoidal", you are again moving away from linearity.

I believe that Andersson has done some "fitting" on experimental data of cosmic ray flux, which proves the cos^2θ distribution.

So it is an experimental model, as far as I know.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
This is an approximation, and as such, you won't be able to derive it.

If cosmic rays were uniform and isotropic, you'd expect a distribution that goes more like 1/cos(theta), because there's not a lot of area with a small zenith angle compared to a large one. However, as atha points out, we have an atmosphere, so cosmic rays from the horizon are unlikely to make it to us.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thanks all. Yes I also looked too much in the literature without finding any clue, all state is as empirical formula or experimental fact. Thanks for your responses.
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top