Why Is There a Maximum Electric Field Point Outside a Charged Ring?

AI Thread Summary
In a uniformly charged ring, the electric field is zero at the center due to charge cancellation and approaches zero at infinity. There exists a specific point along the axis of the ring, referred to as point X, where the electric field reaches its maximum. This phenomenon occurs because the contributions of the electric field from different parts of the ring combine to create a peak at point X. To determine the electric field at this point, Coulomb's law can be applied, integrating the force from infinitesimal charge elements around the ring. The resulting formula for the electric field shows how it varies with distance from the ring, explaining the maximum observed.
Brad_1234
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
In a uniformly charged ring of radius r, if there is an imaginary line from the center of the ring extending outward
||
||
||
||-----------------X-------------------------------> infinity
||
||
||

At the center of the ring I am told the charges cancel so the net charge is zero. And at infinity, the charge is so small it approaches zero.

Going out from the ring, there is some point X where the charge is greatest.

Why does this effect take place? How to figure out the field energy lines that have an effect on point X?

tia
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you have to determine maximum Elecric field on the axis of the ring
 
You can work this out just using coulombs law. Work out the force on a particle at a distance s due to an infinitismal point of the ring and then integrate around the ring. If you do it right you'll get.
E=K\frac{qz}{(z^2+R^2)^\frac{3}{2}}
where q is the total charge on the ring and z is the distance along the perpendicular axis.
I don't think this really answers your question but perhaps if you plot it, it might be of some help. It at least explains why there is a point where the electric field is at a maximum.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top