Why k in E(k) diagram continuous?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter RichardNL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Continuous Diagram
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the continuity of the wave vector \( k \) in the energy-momentum (\( E(k) \)) diagram and its relationship to the discrete reciprocal lattice vectors that arise from Fourier analysis in the context of quantum mechanics and solid-state physics. Participants explore theoretical implications, mathematical representations, and the role of periodicity in wave functions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that in the thermodynamic limit, where the lattice is infinite, the Fourier domain becomes continuous.
  • Others describe how in one-dimensional systems, the relationship between \( k \) and the reciprocal lattice vectors can be understood through the periodicity of sine waves and their corresponding wavelengths.
  • A participant questions the relationship between the continuous points in \( k \)-space and the discrete Fourier components that solve the Schrödinger equation.
  • It is noted that the periodic Hamiltonian allows for the application of Bloch's theorem, leading to wave functions that are periodic in \( k \)-space, which restricts \( k \) to the first Brillouin zone.
  • Some participants clarify that the wave functions can be expressed as a combination of plane waves, with \( k \) values defined by the reciprocal lattice vectors, and discuss the implications for electronic structure calculations.
  • There is a discussion about the basis of \( k \)-space and whether the spacing of \( 2\pi/a \) is consistent across different contexts.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the continuity of \( k \) in the \( E(k) \) diagram, with some asserting it is continuous under certain conditions while others emphasize the discrete nature of reciprocal lattice vectors. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of these perspectives.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include assumptions about the infinite lattice and the implications of periodicity in wave functions, as well as the dependence on definitions of the first Brillouin zone and the role of Fourier components in the solutions of the Schrödinger equation.

RichardNL
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
i am wondering why k in E(k) diagram is continuous?
How is it related to discrete reciprocal lattice which are Fourier components?
richard
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is usually assumed that one is working in the thermodynamic limit, i.e. there is an infinite lattice. In that case, the Fourier domain is compact but continuous.
 
Think about this in 1D. You have an infinite lattice with period a. Say you have some function that exists on the lattice which can be described by a the function sin(k x) where is the position in space and k is some number. Actually you can think of k as an index and the k-space as a list of these indices. So a point in k-space represents a wave in x-space.

What happens when k is exactly a reciprocal lattice vector, 2 pi/a? Then the sine wave has a period exactly a the period, a.

What happens when k is smaller than the reciprocal lattice vector? Then the period of the sine wave is longer than a.

What happens when k is bigger than 2 pi/a? Then the period of the sine wave is smaller than a.

Hopefully you can see how this is extended into 3D.

Therefore k-space is a convenient way to describe families of periodic functions that exist in real space. As it happens, we can conveniently describe the solution to Schrödinger's equation for electrons in a crystal using k-space.
 
Dear bpsbps,
thanks for reply and help,

Solution of Schrödinger's equation require non zero Fourier components only for reciprocal lattice vector K, which is a discrete set of latice points.
How this Fourier analysis of Schro eq: and k-space related?

is any of the continuous points in k-space are Fourier components solution of Schro: eq?

regards
 
RichardNL said:
Is any of the continuous points in k-space are Fourier components solution of Schro: eq?

A plane wave in real-space is a point in k-space.

The k-value of the point is 2 pi / lambda where lambda is the real space wavelength of the plane wave.

Perhaps I do not understand correctly what you are asking.
 
RichardNL said:
i am wondering why k in E(k) diagram is continuous?
How is it related to discrete reciprocal lattice which are Fourier components?
richard

who said it's continuous? It's not continuous unless you have an infinite lattice as was pointed out...

IN 1-D the spacing between k's is 2pi/L where L is the length of the atomic wire.
 
RichardNL said:
Dear bpsbps,
thanks for reply and help,

Solution of Schrödinger's equation require non zero Fourier components only for reciprocal lattice vector K, which is a discrete set of latice points.
How this Fourier analysis of Schro eq: and k-space related?

is any of the continuous points in k-space are Fourier components solution of Schro: eq?

regards

There are two different things.

When you have a periodic Hamiltonian, you can block diagonalize it using Bloch's theorem giving the pseudomomentum k as a good quantum number. It turns out the resulting wave functions are periodic in k space with periods equal to the primitive reciprocal lattice vectors. So you can restrict k to live within the first Brillouin zone (the set of points closer to the origin than any other point which is periodic with k = 0).

Once you have applied Bloch's theorem, you have wavefunctions:
[tex]\psi_{n,\mathbf{k}}(\mathbf{r}) = e^{i \mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{r}) u_{\mathbf{k}n}(\mathbf{r})[/tex]
where [tex]u_{\mathbf{k}n}(\mathbf{r})[/tex] is periodic within the unit cell. Since u is periodic in space, Fourier expansion of u will only allow wave vectors which have the same period as u or an integer multiple of the period of u. These wave vectors turn out to be reciprocal lattice vectors.
 
Dear Kanato, Thanks for helpful reply...

So, to summarize, k space contains number of unit cell (in infinite lattice, it is dense). Due to periodicity of wavefunction in k space, points outside of BZ are taken back to first BZ. In electronic structure calculation, it is done by sampling the first BZ with a fine grid. So this is about e^(ik.r) component of Bloch function.

second component, namely u_kn(r), is Fourier expansion of solution of Schro Eq. which is infinite discrete lattice points defined by reciprocal lattice vectors. In electronic structure calculation, the approximation is taken by taken large number of Fourier components (as described by planewave cutoff energy).

My question is the basis of k-space (2*Pi/a) where a is lattice constant is same for both or not.

thanks
 
In 1d, the first BZ is:
[tex]-\pi/a < k < \pi/a[/tex]

When expanding the wavefunction in a planewave basis:

[tex]u_{k}(x) = \sum_n c_{kn} \,e^{iG_nx}[/tex]

[tex]G_n = n \frac{2\pi}a \qquad n \in \{0, \pm 1, \pm 2, ...\}[/tex]

G_n labels the planewaves. 2pi/a gives the boundaries of k vectors in the first BZ (it's 2pi/a wide). n2pi/a gives you the plane waves you can expand a wavefunction in, where n is an integer.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K