I Will a Dense Green Object Sink in a Sealed Water-Filled Pipe?

AI Thread Summary
In a sealed, water-filled pipe, a dense green object with a density greater than water (1.2) will sink due to its weight being greater than the buoyant force acting on it. The discussion emphasizes that the focus should remain on the object's behavior inside the pipe, rather than external factors like the stability of the pipe structure. Participants clarify that the sinking is a result of the object's density, not the overall weight of the system. The conversation references Archimedes' principle to support the argument about buoyancy. Ultimately, the consensus is that the green object will indeed sink in the water-filled pipe.
Meteor73
Please see the below image, it is a closed and well sealed circulated pipe structure, fully filled with water and no air inside. The density of that green object is greater than water (say 1.2 while water is 1). In this situation, will the green object be sunk? Better with some explanations, but not only yes or no, thanks!

43899_20170906_114514.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Meteor73 said:
In this situation, will the green object be sunk?

what do you think and why ?
 
davenn said:
what do you think and why ?

Thanks for your reply, I think it will be sunk, as the total weight in the pipe with green object is heavier than the other pipe. I just want to confirm this and no need to consider other things.
 
Meteor73 said:
as the total weight in the pipe with green object is heavier than the other pipe
That is the reason why the whole thing would fall over, not why the green object sinks inside.
 
A.T. said:
That is the reason why the whole thing would fall over, not why the green object sinks inside.
Sorry, do you mean water in both pipes will fall, and vacuum creates at top??
 
A.T. said:
That is the reason why the whole thing would fall over, not why the green object sinks inside.
He left out the clamps for the experiment in the diagram. Did we not automatically take that into account? If the possibility of toppling was meant to be discussed, wouldn't there have been a table top in the diagram?
@Meteor73 that looks an OK argument - straight out of Archimedes
 
sophiecentaur said:
He left out the clamps for the experiment in the diagram. Did we not automatically take that into account? If the possibility of toppling was meant to be discussed, wouldn't there have been a table top in the diagram?
@Meteor73 that looks an OK argument - straight out of Archimedes

:biggrin: Thanks Sophie, this is not the scope of the experiment. We can assume the pipe structure is well fixed, and just focus on what happen inside the pipe.
 
Back
Top