Will Changing the Air Column Length in a Pipe Create Resonance in Helium?

AI Thread Summary
Changing the air column length in a pipe submerged in water can create resonances when using helium, as the speed of sound in helium is three times greater than in air. Resonance occurs at specific lengths of the pipe, calculated using the formula f = nv/(4l), where n is an odd integer. The first three resonant lengths correspond to wavelengths of λ/4, 3λ/4, and 5λ/4, respectively. To determine the actual lengths, the frequency of the sound source is necessary, as it influences the wavelength. Without this frequency, only the relationship between resonant lengths in air and helium can be established.
jimmy_neutron
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Here's the situation: you have a pipe in a bucket of water and can vary the length of the air column in the pipe by raising or lowering it.

Here's my question, hope someone can help.
The speed of sound in helium is three times greater than the speed of sound in air (340m/s). Under these conditions will there be any resonances as you change the pipe length. If so what lengths of the pipe will give you resonances (first three resonant lengths).

Where do I get started? thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The frequencies possible in a pipe closed one end are
f = nv / (4l)
n is an odd number (1,3,5,...)
So for first three resonant freqs. you have to put the value of n as 1,3,5 respectively and solve.
 
Using the basic wave equation
v=\lambda f
The wavelength in air will be
\lambda_a=\frac{v_a}{f}
The wavelength in helium gas will be
\lambda_h\frac{v_h}f}
which comes to
\lambda_h=\frac{3v_a}{f}
therefore the wavelength in helium will be three times of that in air
\lambda_h=3\lambda_a
Now as you raise the pipe resonance will form when its length is equal to one quarter of a wavelength l=\frac{\lambda}{4}, the next resonance will form as the pipe length can hold what fraction of the wavelength?
 
Last edited:
andrevdh said:
Now as you raise the pipe resonance will form when its length is equal to one quarter of a wavelength l=\frac{\lambda}{4}, the next resonance will form as the pipe length can hold what fraction of the wavelength?

Ok, so for the first resonance it will be wavelength/4
For the second resonance (the third harmonic) it will be 3x wavelength/4
And for the third resonance it will be 5x wavelength/4

How do I find the wavelength in order to calculate the length of the pipe?

thanks.
 
jimmy_neutron said:
Ok, so for the first resonance it will be wavelength/4
For the second resonance (the third harmonic) it will be 3x wavelength/4
And for the third resonance it will be 5x wavelength/4

How do I find the wavelength in order to calculate the length of the pipe?

thanks.

If you are looking for numerical values of lengths, you are stuck. It seems to me that the question is incomplete. Are you sure they don't provide the frequency of the source of sound?? Without that, you can't answer the question! (if they give the speed of sound, this suggests that they must have given the frequency somewhere)
 
One can conclude from the wave equation
v=\lambda f
that if the frequency changes the wavelength will change and therefore the length at which standing waves will form, no matter in which medium you perform the experiment. All one can say from such an analysis is how the resonance lengths in air will relate to those in helium. I assume that since the lengths in air is known according to the formulas to be
l_1=\frac{\lambda}{4}
the corresponding length for the same frequency in helium will be
3l_1
see if you can find the other two in terms of l_1
 
Last edited:
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top