Will Graphene Be the Next Breakthrough Material for High Speed Microprocessors?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ElliotSmith
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Silicon
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the potential replacement of silicon in microprocessors with alternative materials like graphene, gallium arsenide, and organic semiconductors. Graphene is highlighted for its theoretical capability to enable processors to operate at speeds of hundreds of GHz, but practical mass production remains a significant challenge. The existing silicon infrastructure, backed by hundreds of billions of dollars in investment, poses a formidable barrier to the adoption of new materials. Historical attempts to replace silicon have consistently failed, as silicon continues to evolve under Moore's Law, which predicts ongoing advancements in silicon technology. The lengthy timeline of 6-10 years from laboratory demonstration to commercial production means that silicon's capabilities may outpace potential challengers during this period. Furthermore, the economic viability of producing alternative materials at scale, along with the maturity of existing silicon production lines, suggests that silicon will remain dominant in the semiconductor industry for the foreseeable future.
ElliotSmith
Messages
167
Reaction score
104
TL;DR Summary
Will silicon be replaced by a new material in order to open up new possibilities?
Will silicon be replaced by a new material in order to open up new possibilities in the world of microprocessors?

I believe I read that a graphene processor will allow processors to run at speeds of hundreds of GHz.
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
For theoretical devices, yes, for mass produced production devices ?

There are 100's of Billions of dollars invested in the current silicon device infrastructure. I don't see that being replaced anytime soon.
 
This is not the first challenger. Gallium arsenide, and organics were among the past contenders for replacing silicon. Predictions of silicon's demise started in the 1970s and never stopped.

Here's the hurdle for challengers. It takes 6-10 years between a laboratory demonstration and commercial production. During those years, Moore's Law continues and the abilities of silicon grow to the point where silicon outperform the challenger. In other words, it is a moving target. Moore's Law won't begin to apply to a challenger until the challenger succeeds in replacing the silicon.

Predictions of the end of the road for Moore's Law have also been continuous since the 1970s, but it hasn't happened yet.
 
  • Like
Likes nsaspook
To displace silicon and germanium you need to able to produce high yield, LOW cost glue and controller devices of a much lower complexity than the top of the line computer chips. The equipment lines for these types are devices are very mature, paid off and are making good money from the 40 years of R&D it took to get us here riding silicon. The second and third tier semiconductor producers will be making silicon devices for the foreseeable future because they are always a few generations behind the latest technology. When the first line producers stop handing down used silicon process equipment for great prices and the little guys are forced to switch to a better current process is when silicon will be replaced.
 
Have there been any proof-of-concept chips made using material other than silicon?
 
Back
Top