Will a Car Skid? | Friction and Centripetal Acceleration

  • Thread starter Thread starter Joe Cruz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Car
AI Thread Summary
A car traveling in a circle with a diameter of 500m at a speed of 25 m/s may skid depending on the forces acting on it. The static friction force is greater than the centripetal force required to keep the car moving in a circle, suggesting that the car will not skid. Kinetic friction comes into play only if the car begins to skid, which occurs when the force acting on the car exceeds the static friction force. The discussion clarifies that static friction is essential for maintaining circular motion, while kinetic friction is relevant only during skidding. Understanding the difference between these friction types is crucial for determining skid conditions.
Joe Cruz
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
1. A car travels around a circle with a diameter of 500m at a constant speed of 25 m/s. The static friction coefficient is 0.3 and the kinetic friction coefficient is 0.2. Will the car skid?

2. F = ma. Ffr = μmg. Centripetal acceleration = v2/radius3. So the math for this particular problem was really simple, my problem seems to be more of a conceptual one.

The force acting on the car = F = m(252/250) = m(2.5)
The static friction force = Fsfr = m(.3)(9.8) = m(2.94)
The kinetic friction force = Fkfr = m(.2)(9.8) = m(1.96)

My first assumption is that the car is going to skid since the car is moving and the force acting on the car exceeds the kinetic friction force, but since Fkfr < F < Fsfr, I'm not entirely sure if this is the correct answer. Anyone want to help clarify this problem for me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you think it means to skid? What is the difference in the frictional forces acting on a car that is skidding and those on a car that is not skidding? At what point will a car become uncontrollable and begin to skid?
 
Ask yourself: If the car was not to skid, what kind of friction must act?
 
First, just want to say Mastodon is the dang. Second, I'm assuming skidding means the force acting on the object exceeds the force of friction.

To answer you Doc, I would say the kinetic friction. My problem is that the force of friction is acting perpendicular to the motion of the car itself, and if only the kinetic friction was determining whether the car would skid, why would he include the static friction coefficient as well? Unless it was just there to distract me...
 
  • Like
Likes AlephNumbers
Joe Cruz said:
I'm assuming skidding means the force acting on the object exceeds the force of friction.
What kind of friction?

Joe Cruz said:
To answer you Doc, I would say the kinetic friction.
That would be incorrect. Realize that when the tire skids the surfaces are slipping against each other--and that means kinetic friction. So only if skidding occurs will kinetic friction be involved.

Joe Cruz said:
My problem is that the force of friction is acting perpendicular to the motion of the car itself, and if only the kinetic friction was determining whether the car would skid, why would he include the static friction coefficient as well? Unless it was just there to distract me...
The force that prevents the car from skidding outward--the force that keeps it moving in a circle--must be static friction. The question is: Is there enough static friction to provide the needed centripetal force?
 
Doc Al said:
That would be incorrect. Realize that when the tire skids the surfaces are slipping against each other--and that means kinetic friction. So only if skidding occurs will kinetic friction be involved.

The car being in motion really confused me, but that cleared everything up for me. Thank you.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top