Wondering why my method of finding charge doesn't work?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the maximum charge on a parallel plate capacitor with a capacitance of 5.00 pF and a plate separation of 1.50 mm, ensuring the electric field does not exceed 3.00 x 104 V/m. The correct method involves calculating the maximum potential (Vmax = 45 V) and then using Qmax = CVmax to find the charge (Qmax = 225 pC). The user attempted an alternative method using surface charge density (σ) but misapplied the area formula, leading to an incorrect charge calculation of 3.98 x 10-10 C. The confusion arose from different approaches to solving for electric fields in capacitors.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of parallel plate capacitors
  • Familiarity with electric field equations
  • Knowledge of capacitance and charge relationships
  • Basic algebra for manipulating equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the capacitance formula for parallel plate capacitors
  • Learn about electric field calculations in different geometries
  • Explore the concept of surface charge density (σ) in capacitors
  • Review the relationship between charge, voltage, and capacitance in electrical circuits
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or electrical engineering, educators teaching capacitor theory, and anyone seeking to understand the principles of electric fields and capacitance calculations.

pradeepk
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A parallel plate capacitor has a capacitance of C=5.00pF when there is air between the plates. The separation between the plates is 1.50mm. What is the maximum magnitude of charge Q that can be placed on each plate if the electric field in the region between the plates is not to exceed 3.00 x 10^4 V/m?


Homework Equations


Equations my professor used:
Vmax=Emax*d
Qmax=CVmax

Equations I used:
E=σ/ε

The Attempt at a Solution


So the way my professor solved which is probably the easiest way and the right way is first he solved for the maximum potential:
Vmax=Emaxd
= (3.00 x 10^4 V/m)(1.50 x 10^-3m)= 45V
Then you can solve for the charge:
Qmax=CVmax
= (5pF)(45.0V)= 225pC

So the way I did it was that since we have parallel plates, we know the electric field between them is E=σ/ε. So:
3.00 x 10^4 V/m= σ/(8.85 x 10^-12 C^/Nm^2)
σ=2.655 x 10^-7

And since σ=Q/L
Q=σL
=(2.655 x 1-^-7)(1.50 x 10^-3 M)
=3.98 x 10^-10 C A different answer than my professor.

I know that my units are all messed up. But I just get confused because there are so many different ways to solve for the electric field..so shouldn't they all equal the same thing? Or is this different because it is a capacitor? Any help would be appreciated. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
pradeepk said:
And since σ=Q/L
Q=σL
=(2.655 x 1-^-7)(1.50 x 10^-3 M)
=3.98 x 10^-10 C A different answer than my professor.
σ = Q/Area (not Q/L)

You need to make use of the given capacitance to find the charge.
 
ohhh ok I feel stupid now. So if we know the are then we could use this way. My professor however on a different problem used A=2∏r^2 for the area of the parallel capacitors. That doesn't really make sense to me since they are rectangles..
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K