Work and heat transferred in ideal engine

  • Thread starter Thread starter El Hombre Invisible
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Engine Heat Work
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the analysis of work and heat transfer in an ideal engine operating with one mole of ideal gas. The system undergoes an adiabatic expansion, isothermal compression, and isochoric heating, with the efficiency of the engine defined by the equation η = 1 - (T2 ln(T1/T2))/(T1 - T2). Key calculations include work done during each phase, with specific attention to the relationships between temperature, volume, and heat capacities (C_P and C_V). The final solution confirms the correctness of the initial approach after addressing a misunderstanding regarding heat evaluation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thermodynamic processes, specifically adiabatic and isothermal processes.
  • Familiarity with the ideal gas law (PV = nRT).
  • Knowledge of heat capacities (C_P and C_V) and their relationship (C_P - C_V = nR).
  • Concept of efficiency in thermodynamic cycles.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the efficiency formula for various thermodynamic cycles.
  • Learn about the implications of the first law of thermodynamics in closed systems.
  • Explore the concept of adiabatic processes in greater detail, including real-world applications.
  • Investigate the role of heat capacities in different types of gases and their impact on engine efficiency.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in thermodynamics, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of ideal gas behavior and engine efficiency calculations.

El Hombre Invisible
Messages
691
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Work and heat transferred in ideal engine

Homework Statement



System is ideal engine containing one mole of ideal gas.

System in initial state P1, V1, T1.
System undergoes free expansion along adiabat to P2, V2, T2.
System undergoes isothermal compression to P3, V3, T3.
System is heated along isochore back to P1, V1, T1.

Give the work and heat for each path in terms of T1, T2, and C_{P}, C_{V} and \gamma. Show that the efficiency of the engine is:

\eta = 1 - \frac{T_{2} ln(T_{1}/T_{2})}{T_{1} - T_{2}}

Homework Equations



From the above we see that V3 = V1 and T3 = T2.
Convention used is dU = dW + dQ

PV = nRT
W = -\int P dV
T_{1}V_{1}^{\gamma - 1} = T_{2}V_{2}^{\gamma - 1}
C_{P} - C_{V} = nR

The Attempt at a Solution



For the first adiabatic path:

Q = 0
W = C_{V}(T_{1} - T_{2})

For the third, isochoral path:

W = 0 since the volume is constant
Q = C_{V}(T_{1} - T_{2})

For the second, isothermal path, well: internal energy is constant, therefore:

W = -Q
W = -\int _{V2} ^{V1} \frac{nRT_{2}}{V} dV<br /> = (C_{P} - C_{V})T_{2} [ln(V_{2}) - ln(V_{1})] = (C_{P} - C_{V})T_{2} ln\left(\frac{V_{2}}{V_{1}}\right)

This is where this gets awkward and I'd appreciate someone checking what I've done. Because I have W in terms of V but I want it in terms of T, I used:

T_{1}V_{1}^{\gamma - 1} = T_{2}V_{2}^{\gamma - 1}
and took the \gamma - 1 root, giving:

T_{1}^{\frac{1}{\gamma - 1}}V_{1} = T_{2}^{\frac{1}{\gamma - 1}}V_{2}

Substituting into by expression for W:

W = (C_{P} - C_{V})T_{2} ln\left(\left(\frac{T_{1}}{T_{2}}\right)^\frac{1}{\gamma - 1}\right)<br /> = (C_{P} - C_{V})T_{2} \frac{ln(T_{1}/T_{2})}{\gamma - 1}

This seems an extreme solution. It also seems wrong since evaluating \eta = \frac{W}{Q} does not give the desired equality. Any obvious errors?

Cheers,

El Hombre
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Won't the work done in the free expansion from (P1, V1, T1) to (P2, V2, T2) be 0 by definition? So, while the pressure and the volumes change, the temperature won't.
 
siddharth said:
Won't the work done in the free expansion from (P1, V1, T1) to (P2, V2, T2) be 0 by definition? So, while the pressure and the volumes change, the temperature won't.

Apologies, that should have been 'adiabatic expansion' not 'free expansion'. Turned out my solution was correct: I had stupidly used the net heat instead of the heat in when evaluating the efficiency though, so I thought, as I had expected, my method was wrong. All's well that ends well.

Thanks anyway...

El Hombre
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
14K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K