Work - Area under curve of F vs. d graph

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating work done using the area under a force vs. distance graph, where the force is not constant. The user is attempting to find the force required to move a cart between two points and is confused about the integration process, as they have not yet covered integrals in their course. They propose using trapezoidal area calculations instead, referencing geometric methods and the work-energy theorem. The user expresses uncertainty about their calculations for both parts of the problem, specifically the values of work and velocity. The conversation highlights the challenge of applying advanced concepts without prior instruction on the necessary mathematical techniques.
jtw2e
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



5487469616_5c78cee779_z.jpg


Homework Equations



W=FD
Area under curve = Work

The Attempt at a Solution



Note, although the problem doesn't say this, and the given graph and description are deceptive, Force is NOT constant.

I need to somehow find the Force required to move the cart from 2.5 to 4.2 ft so that I can find the area under the two sections... at least I think that's how to do it. But I have no idea how in the world to find the Force. I've tried work-energy theorem but don't have enough info (don't know v1 or v2 or accel).

Please help me understand this. They did not cover it or even address it in lecture and it was assigned today and is due tonight.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As I understand, You must take the integral from 2.5-a to 4.2=b of the equation 28/2.5x and find the anti-derivative of 28/2.5x(11.2x), since for every 11.2 pounds a foot is increased and vice-versa, kind of like the spring constant in a spring if you are familiar with that.
you end up with 1/2 times 11.2 times (4.2 squared minus 2.5 squared) which is about 63.784lb-ft. is that the answer for a?
as far as for b, I think its just 11.2 times (4.2 squared minus 2.5 squared) since the anti-derivative of the 11.2x equation respresnts s(x) aka position and 11.2x itself respresents v(x) velocity. So, the answer for b is probably 127.568m/s. that the answer for b?
 
and when they mean force is not constant, it means that it changes as displacement does, there for you would acquire an equation of the increase of force as displacement increases. so the formula would be 28lb/2.5meters, which is 11.2lb/m or 11.2x.
 
Rayquesto said:
and when they mean force is not constant, it means that it changes as displacement does, there for you would acquire an equation of the increase of force as displacement increases. so the formula would be 28lb/2.5meters, which is 11.2lb/m or 11.2x.

Rayquesto said:
As I understand, You must take the integral from 2.5-a to 4.2=b of the equation 28/2.5x and find the anti-derivative of 28/2.5x(11.2x), since for every 11.2 pounds a foot is increased and vice-versa, kind of like the spring constant in a spring if you are familiar with that.
you end up with 1/2 times 11.2 times (4.2 squared minus 2.5 squared) which is about 63.784lb-ft. is that the answer for a?
as far as for b, I think its just 11.2 times (4.2 squared minus 2.5 squared) since the anti-derivative of the 11.2x equation respresnts s(x) aka position and 11.2x itself respresents v(x) velocity. So, the answer for b is probably 127.568m/s. that the answer for b?


Thanks very much for your detailed reply, but we are not covering integrals until next semester; the only concept we're supposed to use is dealing with finding the Area of trapezoids under the curve with regular geometry. And also k = 1/2mv^2, and possibly Wtot=K2 - K1. So I don't know the technique to take the integral or find an anti-derivative, and am expected to solve this by a different method. :( I'm sorry, I do not know whether our value for a) and b) are correct.
 
Last edited:
AH darn! That makes things too complicated. riemann sums are really tough. so what you should do instead is just find the area under the curve. so A(x)= the limit as n approaches infinity of the sigma series (i/n)(11.2x) where i is n(nplus 1)/2 and n is the amount of squares ...so A(x)=(11.2x/n)(n^2plusn)/2=11.2xnplus 11.2x/2 and suppose we have 100 squares. at x=2.5 which would be 1414 oh crap I am sorry this isn't right but i got to go. be back in a few minutes.
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top