Work done by a harmonic oscillator

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the work done by a harmonic oscillator, highlighting the misconception that the force acting on the oscillator is constant. It begins with the formula for work, W = -ΔU, and critiques the assumption of constant force in the context of Hooke's law. The correct approach involves recognizing that the force varies with displacement, leading to the integral form W = ∫F(x)dx. The conversation emphasizes that while dW = Fdx is a valid expression, it applies only when the force is constant; otherwise, the force must remain within the differential. Ultimately, the clarification reinforces the importance of integrating variable forces to accurately calculate work.
Hunt_
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
In the case of an undamped oscillator, the work done by the system is written as ( assume initial position is 0 ) :

W = - \Delta U = - K \frac{x^2}{2}

But to verify this , we must assume that the force acting on the oscillator is constant , which is not true as F = f(x) according to hook's law.

To find an expression for the work done by the system I start with :

dW = Cos(F,x) \ d(Fx) = d(Fx) = -K d(x^2)

then it follows that

W = - K x^2

Ofcourse this eq must be wrong , but I wonder why. Why should the force of the spring be constant ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The force of the spring isn't constant:

dW = Fdx = kx dx

Integrate that and you'll get the correct answer.
 
When you write dW=Fdx you already assume the force is constant . Otherwise , why would F be outside the differential ? We should write dW = d(Fx) keeping F inside the differential as it is not a constant. dW = Fdx is correct only when F = constant. True ?

Notice , when calculating the work done by an electron in a battery , we write dW = d(Fx) = d(qEx) = Vdq assuming the potential difference V = const while q is a variable. ( In this case F is not constant ). Had we written directly dW = Fdx , we would not obtain the correct expression. It is not necessary that dW = Fdx always holds true, it depends on the situation.

I hope you got my point.
 
Hunt_ said:
When you write dW=Fdx you already assume the force is constant . Otherwise , why would F be outside the differential ? We should write dW = d(Fx) keeping F inside the differential as it is not a constant. dW = Fdx is correct only when F = constant. True ?
No, not true. The differential element of work is dW = Fdx, not dW = d(Fx). (What does dF even mean? A small change in F?) Work is Force times distance; we need to add up (integrate) all the contributions of Force*dx over the variable x. Whether F is constant or not is a different story: if F is constant, then you can take it out of the integral. In this case F is a function of x, so dW = Fdx = kx dx:

W = \int F(x) dx \neq F(x) \int dx

W = \int F(x) dx = \int k x dx = 1/2 kx^2

Notice , when calculating the work done by an electron in a battery , we write dW = d(Fx) = d(qEx) = Vdq assuming the potential difference V = const while q is a variable. ( In this case F is not constant ). Had we written directly dW = Fdx , we would not obtain the correct expression. It is not necessary that dW = Fdx always holds true, it depends on the situation.
Again, incorrect. dW = F dx is always true--it's the basic definition of work. In the case where force is constant (and in the same direction as displacement):

W = \int F dx = F \int dx = Fx
 
Thanks , I think it makes much more sense now.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top