Work Done by a Spring Force and block problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the work done by a spring force on a block moving from 8.0 cm to 7.0 cm. The spring constant (k) is determined using the formula k = Fs/d, resulting in k = 1000 N/m. Potential energy (PE) in the spring is calculated with PE = 1/2 kx^2, prompting questions about how to find k. There is a debate on whether the work done can be calculated using W = Fd, as the force is not constant. Ultimately, the graph provided clarifies that the spring force is linear, validating the use of the equations discussed.
soul5
Messages
63
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



http://edugen.wiley.com/edugen/courses/crs1650/art/qb/qu/c07/pict_7_36.gif

gives spring force Fx versus position x for the spring–block arrangement

http://edugen.wiley.com/edugen/courses/crs1650/art/qb/qu/c07/pict_7_11.gif


The scale is set by Fs = 160 N. We release the block at x = 16.0 cm. How much work does the spring do on the block when the block moves from xi =+8.0 cm to x=+7.0 cm


Homework Equations



Fs = -kd

W = Fd

The Attempt at a Solution



Fs/d = k

160N/0.16m = k

1000 = k

kd = F

1000*1m = 1000N

1000N * 1m = W

W = 1000J


I don't know how to this question please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When it is stretched to 8 cm how much PE is in the spring?

As it moves back to 7 cm how much potential energy is in the spring?

Isn't the difference then the Work that went to kinetic energy?
 
I disagree with your equations. Force isn't constant, so I don't think you can use W = Fd

Edit: Actually, I may be wrong... I didn't notice that graph you posted up top. I've never seen a spring problem set up with a graph like that before. Disregard this post. :-p
 
LowlyPion said:
When it is stretched to 8 cm how much PE is in the spring?

As it moves back to 7 cm how much potential energy is in the spring?

Isn't the difference then the Work that went to kinetic energy?

PE is just PE = 1/2kx^2

but how do we find k?


160N/0.16m = k

?
 
soul5 said:
PE is just PE = 1/2kx^2

but how do we find k?


160N/0.16m = k

?

That's what I would use.

F = kx so ... why not? The graph says it's linear.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top