Work done by charge in electric field on the xyz plane

AI Thread Summary
A uniform electric field of 270 N/C is oriented at angles of 32° and 58° with respect to the z and x axes, respectively. The work done by the electric field on a charge of 0.475 C moving from (2.0 cm, 0, 0) to (8.5 cm, 6.0 cm, -5.5 cm) is calculated using the formula W = qE·d. The displacement vector is determined to be (0.065 i + 0.06 j - 0.055 k), and the electric field components are confirmed as (143.08 i + 0 j + 228.97 k). The final work done is found to be -1.56 J, indicating that the charge moves against the electric field.
PhysicsQuest1
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



There is a uniform electric field, E = 270 N/C, parallel to the xz plane, making an angle of 32o with the positive z axis and an angle of 58o with the positive x axis. A particle with charge q= 0.475 C is moved from the point (xi = 2.0 cm, yi = 0, zi = 0) to the point (xf = 8.5 cm, yf = 6.0 cm, zf = -5.5 cm). How much work is done by the electric field.

Homework Equations



W = qE.d

The Attempt at a Solution



The only change in distance I need is parallel to the electric field in the x-z plane.

I have no idea how to find the distance. This is what I tried.

d = (0.055m)2+(0.065m)2 = 0.085 m

Then I believe it's a matter of substituting this into the above equation with the angle which I also don't know how to find. Some guidance would be appreciated thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How about expressing the displacement and the field vectors in terms of their components? Remember, you can also write ## \mathbf{A}\cdot\mathbf{B} = A_xB_x + A_yB_y + A_zB_z ##.
 
Geofleur said:
How about expressing the displacement and the field vectors in terms of their components? Remember, you can also write ## \mathbf{A}\cdot\mathbf{B} = A_xB_x + A_yB_y + A_zB_z ##.

Could you tell me if this is right?

E = 270 Cos 58oi + 270 Cos 32ok
= 143.08 i + 0 j + 228.97 k

If that's my electric field I basically subtract the distance points to get (d) and put it in W = qE.d to get W. Then I can square the values, add them and square root it to get the magnitude of W?
 
Your components for ## \mathbf{E} ## look good, but note that ## W ## is a scalar, not a vector. ## W = \Delta \mathbf{r} \cdot q\mathbf{E} ##, and the dot product always yields a scalar.
 
Geofleur said:
Your components for ## \mathbf{E} ## look good, but note that ## W ## is a scalar, not a vector. ## W = \Delta \mathbf{r} \cdot q\mathbf{E} ##, and the dot product always yields a scalar.

So that means

Since my ## \Delta \mathbf{r} ## = (0.065 i + 0.06 j -0.055 k)

Therefore W = | (0.065 i + 0.06 j -0.055 k) ## \cdot ## 0.475 (143.08 i + 0 j + 228.97 k)|
= |4.4176 - 5.9818|
= 1.56 J

Am I correct here? (btw Thanks for your quick responses)
 
Why take the absolute value? Nothing says that the work has to be positive.
 
Geofleur said:
Why take the absolute value? Nothing says that the work has to be positive.
Oh yeah good point. So W = -1.56 J. I guess I did it right?
 
As a check, you could use the fact that ## \mathbf{E}\cdot\Delta\mathbf{r} = E\Delta r\cos\theta ## to get the angle between ## \mathbf{E} ## and ##\Delta \mathbf{r}##. If the angle is more than 90 degrees, you should expect the work to be negative for a positive charge, like in this case. If you throw a rock upward, then while the rock is traveling upward, gravity is performing negative work on it. Same goes for a positive charge moving against the electric field.
 
Geofleur said:
As a check, you could use the fact that ## \mathbf{E}\cdot\Delta\mathbf{r} = E\Delta r\cos\theta ## to get the angle between ## \mathbf{E} ## and ##\Delta \mathbf{r}##. If the angle is more than 90 degrees, you should expect the work to be negative for a positive charge, like in this case. If you throw a rock upward, then while the rock is traveling upward, gravity is performing negative work on it. Same goes for a positive charge moving against the electric field.

Ok thanks for your help!
 
Back
Top