Work done by expanding gas in a gun on a bullet

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the work done by expanding gas on a bullet fired from a rifle, with a specific force equation provided. For part (a), the correct approach involves using calculus to integrate the force function over the barrel length, rather than assuming a constant force. The user initially attempted to calculate work using a simplified method, which led to an incorrect answer. In part (b), the work done for a longer barrel of 1.25 m can also be calculated using the same integration method, allowing for comparison with the first part. The forum highlights the importance of understanding variable forces in physics problems.
TrippingBilly
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
A 135 g bullet is fired from a rifle having a barrel 0.590 m long. Assuming the origin is placed where the bullet begins to move, the force (in Newtons) exerted by the expanding gas on the bullet is 20000 + 8000x - 22000x2, where x is in meters.

(a) Determine the work done by the gas on the bullet as the bullet travels the length of the barrel.
(b) If the barrel is 1.25 m long, how much work is done, and how does this value compare to the work calculated in part (a)?

For part A, i plugged in .590m into x for the equation of the force, multiplied that by .590 because W = Force x Distance, and since they wanted an answer in kJ i divided by 1000, but it says that my answer is incorrect. Any thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your answer would be correct if the force is uniform (constant),but since it isn't, some calculus is required. Note that the formal definition of work done by a force is;

W=\int^{x_{1}}_{x_{0}} F(x) \;dx
 
Wow, thanks. Never would have thought of that. Thanks to this forum for the first time ever I got a 100% on my physics homework
Thanks :biggrin:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top