Work done by expanding gasses on bullet

AI Thread Summary
To determine the work done by the expanding gas on a bullet fired from a rifle, the force exerted is given as a function of displacement, requiring integration to calculate work. For a barrel length of 0.54 m, the initial calculations yielded incorrect results due to treating the force as constant instead of variable. The correct approach involves integrating the force function over the displacement to find the accurate work done. A similar method applies for a barrel length of 0.96 m, allowing for comparison of work done in both scenarios. Understanding the integration of variable forces is crucial for solving this problem accurately.
bdh2991
Messages
102
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 95-g bullet is fired from a rifle having a barrel 0.540 m long. Choose the origin to be at the location where the bullet begins to move. Then the force (in Newtons) exerted by the expanding gas on the bullet is 16200 + 9400x - 23750x2, where x is in meters.
(a) Determine the work done by the gas on the bullet as the bullet travels the length of the barrel.



(b) If the barrel is 0.96 m long, how much work is done?




(c) How does this value compare with the work calculated in part (a)?(% difference)



Homework Equations



W = force * displacement


The Attempt at a Solution



after plugging in 0.54 in the force equation i got F = 14,350.5 N

then multiplied it by 0.54 to get work and got 7.75 kJ

same for the second part but i got both answers wrong, i thought it was a simple problem but i guess not.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Note that the force is a function of x. So, it is not a constant force. You need to know how to get the work done by a variable force.
 
so i basically need to do the integral F dot ds and then plug in the values?
 
bdh2991 said:
so i basically need to do the integral F dot ds and then plug in the values?

Yes, that's it.
 
I should have realized that to begin with but thank you for all the help!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top