Work-Energy Principle: Finding the Length of a Rough Patch

AI Thread Summary
A skater on a frictionless ice rink slows down by 45% upon hitting a rough patch where the friction force is 25% of her weight. The work-energy principle is applied to find the length of the rough patch using the equation KEi + PEi + W(by friction) = KEf + PEf. The skater's initial speed is 3.00 m/s, leading to a final speed of 1.35 m/s after the rough patch. The initial calculations for distance yielded incorrect results due to a misunderstanding of the speed reduction. The correct approach clarifies that the final speed is 45% of the initial speed, leading to the accurate calculation of the rough patch's length.
ahero4eternity
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Work-Energy Principle

1. The problem...
On an essentially frictionless horizontal ice-skating rink, a skater moving at 3.00 m/s encounters a rough patch that reduces her speed by 45.0 % to a friction force that is 25.0 % of her weight.

Use the work-energy principle to find the length of the rough patch.
2. The relevant equation...
KEi + PEi + W(by friction) = KEf + PEf where i = initial and f = final3. My attempt...
Since Work by friction = -Fd, then you can substitute F for (.25 x mg), correct? that is because the Force of friction (F) is 25% of her weight (mg). Ultimately, this is going to allow m to cancel out. With that, I have the equation:

.5mv^2 + mgh + (-.25mg)d = .5mv^2 + mgh

Factoring out the m so it can cancel out I now have:

m (.5v^2 + gh + (-.25g)d) = m (.5v^2 + gh)

Since this is all happening on a level surface, then h = 0. Now I am left with:

.5v^2 + (-.25g)d = .5vf^2

Now, plug in our known values...

.5(3^2) + (-.25 x 9.8)d = .5(.45 x 3)^2

Note: v final = 3 x 45% as stated in the problem

Solving for d, I get 1.46 meters. But this is wrong...



I've also tried this same exact setup using a final speed of 0, getting a distance of 1.84 meters. That, too, is wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ahero4eternity said:
Note: v final = 3 x 45% as stated in the problem
The problem states that the speed is reduced by 45%, not reduced to 45%.
 
Yeh, I got that about 5 mins after I posted this (and the forum for down for me, I couldn't access it). Thanks for your help, though. It's much appreciated. :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top