Work-Energy Principle: Finding the Length of a Rough Patch

AI Thread Summary
A skater on a frictionless ice rink slows down by 45% upon hitting a rough patch where the friction force is 25% of her weight. The work-energy principle is applied to find the length of the rough patch using the equation KEi + PEi + W(by friction) = KEf + PEf. The skater's initial speed is 3.00 m/s, leading to a final speed of 1.35 m/s after the rough patch. The initial calculations for distance yielded incorrect results due to a misunderstanding of the speed reduction. The correct approach clarifies that the final speed is 45% of the initial speed, leading to the accurate calculation of the rough patch's length.
ahero4eternity
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Work-Energy Principle

1. The problem...
On an essentially frictionless horizontal ice-skating rink, a skater moving at 3.00 m/s encounters a rough patch that reduces her speed by 45.0 % to a friction force that is 25.0 % of her weight.

Use the work-energy principle to find the length of the rough patch.
2. The relevant equation...
KEi + PEi + W(by friction) = KEf + PEf where i = initial and f = final3. My attempt...
Since Work by friction = -Fd, then you can substitute F for (.25 x mg), correct? that is because the Force of friction (F) is 25% of her weight (mg). Ultimately, this is going to allow m to cancel out. With that, I have the equation:

.5mv^2 + mgh + (-.25mg)d = .5mv^2 + mgh

Factoring out the m so it can cancel out I now have:

m (.5v^2 + gh + (-.25g)d) = m (.5v^2 + gh)

Since this is all happening on a level surface, then h = 0. Now I am left with:

.5v^2 + (-.25g)d = .5vf^2

Now, plug in our known values...

.5(3^2) + (-.25 x 9.8)d = .5(.45 x 3)^2

Note: v final = 3 x 45% as stated in the problem

Solving for d, I get 1.46 meters. But this is wrong...



I've also tried this same exact setup using a final speed of 0, getting a distance of 1.84 meters. That, too, is wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ahero4eternity said:
Note: v final = 3 x 45% as stated in the problem
The problem states that the speed is reduced by 45%, not reduced to 45%.
 
Yeh, I got that about 5 mins after I posted this (and the forum for down for me, I couldn't access it). Thanks for your help, though. It's much appreciated. :)
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top