Work/Energy vs. Force Questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter adhishyajnik
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion addresses two fundamental physics questions regarding force, work, and energy. The first question examines why the force exerted by a 10 N rock dropped from 10 m cannot be determined without knowing the distance over which it exerts force on the ground. The second question explores the concept of work done by a car moving at constant velocity, clarifying that while the net force is zero, individual forces such as friction still perform work. Key equations discussed include Work = Force * Distance and Kinetic Energy = 1/2 mass * velocity².

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with concepts of work and energy
  • Knowledge of gravitational potential energy calculations
  • Basic grasp of force and acceleration relationships
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the relationship between force, mass, and acceleration using Newton's second law
  • Learn about energy conservation principles in mechanical systems
  • Explore the effects of friction on motion and energy transfer
  • Investigate the impact of non-constant acceleration on force calculations
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of mechanics, particularly in relation to force, work, and energy dynamics.

adhishyajnik
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
A couple of questions:

1. Why can't we tell what force a 10 N rock exerts on the ground when dropped from 10 m?
If a car is moving at constant velocity, it's net force is 0, but it is still doing work. How?

2. Work = force * distance, Kinetic energy = 1/2 mass * velocity2, Force * distance = 1/2 mass * velocity2
3. For the first question, I think a valid solution would be that we don't know the acceleration because the problem doesn't tell us to assume we're on earth. However, I think that's kind of a cop out. A more realistic answer might be that we don't know the distance over which the rock exerts force on the ground: The work is 100 J, and if divided by the distance, we would get the force, right?
For the second question, is this a question about what system we're talking about? Because if the car is the system, it is doing exerting force, but if our system is the car and the road, then the car's force and the frictional force cancel for a net force of zero, allowing the car to move at a constant velocity. So if the net force is 0 N, then the work (Force * distance) should be 0 J. But clearly the car is doing work, because it's kinetic energy is 1/2 mass * velocity2. I'm not exactly sure how to reconcile the two equations.

Thanks!

~ Adhish
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
adhishyajnik said:
A couple of questions:

1. Why can't we tell what force a 10 N rock exerts on the ground when dropped from 10 m?
If a car is moving at constant velocity, it's net force is 0, but it is still doing work. How?

2. Work = force * distance, Kinetic energy = 1/2 mass * velocity2, Force * distance = mass * velocity2



3. For the first question, I think a valid solution would be that we don't know the acceleration because the problem doesn't tell us to assume we're on earth. However, I think that's kind of a cop out. A more realistic answer might be that we don't know the distance over which the rock exerts force on the ground: The work is 100 J, and if divided by the distance, we would get the force, right?
For the second question, is this a question about what system we're talking about? Because if the car is the system, it is doing exerting force, but if our system is the car and the road, then the car's force and the frictional force cancel for a net force of zero, allowing the car to move at a constant velocity. So if the net force is 0 N, then the work (Force * distance) should be 0 J. But clearly the car is doing work, because it's kinetic energy is 1/2 mass * velocity2. I'm not exactly sure how to reconcile the two equations.

Thanks!

~ Adhish

Welcome to PF!

For question two, I think you're onto something. There is a frictional force which is preventing the car from just "coasting" at a constant velocity. The net work done on the car is certainly zero because there is no change in kinetic energy, but the car and friction (wind, tires, whatever) both individually do work!
 
For your first question, the force that the rock exerts on the Earth will be equal to the acceleration (strictly speaking deceleration but I'll use acc. throughout) it experiences multiplied by its mass. In an ideal system, the acceleration will be constant. The distance that the resulting constant decelerating force acts before the rock finishes deforming the ground will be dependent on the initial potential energy, assuming no losses due to air resistance. You can make a basic assumption that object's GPE will be equal to its kinetic energy upon impact, and that kinetic energy must be input to the Earth before the object comes to rest.

So, let's say that your 1 kg rock hits the ground from a height of 10 m. Let's assume it decelerates constantly at 100 g - that is, 100 times the acceleration due to Earth's gravitational field.

The rock has an initial potential energy W:

[tex]W = mgh = 1 kg \times 9.81 ms^{-2} \times 10 m = 98.1 J[/tex]

The decelerating force acting on the rock is given by:

[tex]F = ma = 1 kg \times 100 \times 9.81 ms^{-2} = 981 N[/tex]

Knowing that the kinetic energy of the rock (equal to the potential energy as it falls) must be transferred to the ground before the rock comes to rest:

[tex]mgh = \int^{x=X}_{x=0} F dx = 981 N \times X[/tex]

Rearranging:

[tex]X = \frac{98.1 J}{981 N} = 0.1 m[/tex]

So the object would come to rest after 100 mm in this case.

Unfortunately most impacts involve non-constant accelerations, so to predict the force an object will transmit to another object is pretty difficult without making some big assumptions and understanding how the two objects deform.

Hope this helps
 

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
5K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K