Work required to assemble charged particles

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the work required to assemble eight identical charged particles at the corners of a cube. The key equation used is the change in potential energy, delta U, which is calculated based on the electrostatic interactions between the pairs of charges. There are 28 unique pairs of charges derived from the combination of 8 charges, calculated using the formula 8*7/2. Participants clarify that the energy is inversely proportional to the distance between charges, emphasizing the importance of understanding the geometry of the cube. The conversation highlights confusion regarding the number of pairs and the cube's sides, indicating a need for clarity on these points.
SilverGirl
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


How much work is required to assemble eight identical charged particles, each of magnitude q, at the corners of a cube of side s?


Homework Equations


W=deltaU

delta U = kQq/r


The Attempt at a Solution



I've come up with those equations, and was trying to plug the information into delta U. However, all the charges are identical, so there are not two different values for q. But would it be delta U = kq^2/s ??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I take it that the charges come from infinity.

The work required to bring them in from infinity is the sum of the electrostatic energies of the pairs of charges. With 8 charges there are 8*7/2 = 28 such pairs. These can be viewed as the 12 sides of the cube, its 12 surface diagonals and its 4 body diagonals. Be sure to remember that the energy is inversely proportional to the distance, not (like the force) to the distance squared.
 
Almanzo said:
I take it that the charges come from infinity.

The work required to bring them in from infinity is the sum of the electrostatic energies of the pairs of charges. With 8 charges there are 8*7/2 = 28 such pairs. These can be viewed as the 12 sides of the cube, its 12 surface diagonals and its 4 body diagonals. Be sure to remember that the energy is inversely proportional to the distance, not (like the force) to the distance squared.

Yeah it doesn't say where the charges are coming from.

8*7/2 ... where does the 7/2 come from? How are you getting 28 pairs?

12 sides of a cube? Aren't there only 6?
 
Anyone?
 
Does anyone know how they got the 28 pairs?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top