Would this be possible in a Rocket Engine combustion chamber

AI Thread Summary
In a bell nozzle rocket engine, the fuel pump must supply pressure greater than the combustion chamber pressure for fuel to flow effectively. With a combustion chamber pressure of 300 psi and a fuel pump output of only 100 psi, the setup would not work as intended. Various methods exist to increase fuel pressure, such as using pressure-fed engines or turbopumps. The discussion highlights the impressive performance of the F-1 rocket engines, which operated at a chamber pressure of around 1000 psi. Understanding these principles is crucial for effective rocket engine design and operation.
strk
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Lets say if i have a bell nozzle rocket engine such as this one : http://www.braeunig.us/space/pics/fig1-04.gif and inside the combustion chamber i have an average pressure of around 300 psi. If i wanted to feed in liquid fuel into it while the fuel pump is only able to supply 100 psi of fuel.

my question is would this be able to work? or will it not be able to send any fuel inside the rocket engine. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The performance specs of the F-1 rocket engines used in the first stage of the Saturn V rockets which sent the Apollo spacecraft to the moon are pretty impressive:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rocketdyne_F-1
 
  • Like
Likes strk
SteamKing said:
The performance specs of the F-1 rocket engines used in the first stage of the Saturn V rockets which sent the Apollo spacecraft to the moon are pretty impressive:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rocketdyne_F-1
That is pretty impressive given the fact that chamber pressure was around 1000 psi
 
Venus does not have a magnetosphere, so the Galactic Cosmic Rays (GCRs) environment shall be much worse than in a LEO environment. Looking to the std radiation models for Venus, the standard radiation-hard space level electronic component with tested immunity LET = 85 MeV-cm2/mg seems not enough, so, for example, a 1cm2 Si die will suffer considerable flux above this level during a long mission (10 years for example). So, the question is, usually we are not paying attention to latch-up...
Due to the constant never ending supply of "cool stuff" happening in Aerospace these days I'm creating this thread to consolidate posts every time something new comes along. Please feel free to add random information if its relevant. So to start things off here is the SpaceX Dragon launch coming up shortly, I'll be following up afterwards to see how it all goes. :smile: https://blogs.nasa.gov/spacex/
Thread 'SpaceX Starship development: 7th flight January 10'
Watch the progress live This is a fully stacked Starship (top) and Super Heavy (bottom). A couple of too-small-to-see cars near the bottom for scale, I also added a Saturn V and the Statue of Liberty for comparison. 120 meters tall, about 5000 tonnes when fully fueled. Twice the mass and over twice the thrust of Saturn V. The largest rocket ever built by mass, thrust, height, and payload capacity. N1 had the largest diameter.[/size] But its size is not the revolutionary part. It is designed...

Similar threads

Back
Top