Write Lagrangian Homework: Massless Support to Free Movement Along X-Axis

  • Thread starter Thread starter mattmatt321
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lagrangian Writing
mattmatt321
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I worked a textbook problem earlier where I had to write the Lagrangian for a pendulum (of mass m and length l) connected to a massless support moving along the x-axis. I chose the angle theta as my generalized coordinate, since the problem specified that the acceleration of the massless support was constant in the +x direction, the coordinate "theta" seemed to completely describe the system.

Now, I'm trying to figure out how the Lagrangian would change if the support was no longer massless, and if it was free to move along the x-axis, instead of at a constant acceleration in one direction.

Homework Equations



The potential energy stays the same, U = -mglcosθ.

The kinetic energy I found when the support was massless and at constant acceleration is (1/2)(m)(a2t2 - 2atlcosθ(dθ/dt) + l2(d2θ/dt2).

The Lagrangian is defined as L = T - U.

The Attempt at a Solution



So, now we have the support with mass M and the acceleration is no longer a constant "a". I considered just adding the mass M to m in the kinetic energy equation, but I think there's more to it. I suppose I need to incorporate both θ and the x location of the support to describe the system, but it's tricky to describe the kinetic energy fully. Any help is appreciated as always.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should add the kinetic energy of the support as a separate term:
<br /> T = T_{\text{pend}} + T_{\text{sup}}<br />
 
Thanks, that was my primary question. I'm always a little worried when I'm doing problems like this, that the different parts of the system are actually interacting with each other, and I'll forget term(s) in the kinetic energy.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top