Writing out chemical equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ryuk1990
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chemical Writing
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on writing balanced chemical equations for the reactions of chromium with sulfur and bismuth with oxygen. The correct balanced equation for chromium and sulfur is Cr + 3S → Cr2S3, highlighting the need for subscripts to indicate the ratio of elements. For bismuth and oxygen, bismuth typically has a +3 oxidation state, while oxygen forms O2- ions, leading to the equation 4Bi + 3O2 → 2Bi2O3. The conversation also clarifies misconceptions about ionic charges and the nature of atoms in reactions. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately balancing chemical equations.
Ryuk1990
Messages
157
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Write a balanced equation for:

1. the reaction of chromium with sulfur

2. the reaction of bismuth with oxygen


Homework Equations



Chromium is a transition metal and sulfur has a 2- charge.

The Attempt at a Solution



For the first one, I'm thinking that since sulfur has a 2- then chromium must have a 2+ charge so it would form a product of CrS. I thought it would just be Cr + S ----> CrS

That's before balancing of course but that's not the answer either. It's supposed to be Cr + S ----> Cr2S3 (before balancing)

Why are there subscripts?

The second one makes absolutely no sense to me because O is 2- and Bi is I believe 3-.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Chromium is most commonly found in the +3 oxidation state.

Have you heard of covalent bonding?

Also, the way in which you refer to O as being "2-" etc. is incorrect. An atom is electrically neutral. What you actually mean is that oxygen tends to form O2- ions.
 
Bismuth - like chromium - likes +3, Bi3+.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top