Yet another book recommendation request

AI Thread Summary
Recommendations for books on partial differential equations (PDEs) and complex analysis are sought, particularly from Dover publications. The user currently owns "An Introduction to Partial Differential Equations" by Matthew P. Coleman and "Fundamentals of Complex Analysis" by E. B. Saff and A. D. Snider, but has encountered errors in the PDE book. Suggestions include W. Strauss's book for PDEs, noted for its friendly introduction, and M. Spiegel's Schaum's Outline for complex variables. The user expresses a preference for a PDE book that incorporates complex variables rather than solely trigonometric methods. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the need for reliable and accessible resources in these mathematical fields.
Spectre5
Messages
182
Reaction score
0
Hey,

I am looking for some recommendations on books covering partial differential equations and another one on complex analysis. I don't have a lot of extra money, so I am kind of hoping that someone has experience with some of the Dover books, and could possible recommend any of them? I have looked at many of them on amazon.com, but I simply have no idea which ones are "better" or "worse".


I am very interesting in both the theory and applications of partial differential equations and complex analysis.


Currently, I do have:
An Introduction to Partial Differential Equations by Matthew P Coleman
and
Fundamentals of Complex Analysis by E. B. Saff and A. D. Snider

(these are the books I have from my courses in them)


Thanks for any recommendations!

-Scott

PS:
The book I have on Partial Differential Equations is a first edition book and I have found many mistakes throughout the book (mistakes within the book as well as incorrect answers to selected problems).
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
No suggestions?
 
OK, here goes:

PDE's It's not cheap, but I really like it:, by W. Strauss. I took a course from it, and it is about as friendly an introduction as possible, considering the subject.

Complex Variables I recommend the Schaum's Outline , by M. Spiegel.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thank you for the suggestions. I will look into those. In that pde book, does it teach pde's from the complex perspective or trigonometric?

i.e. My pde book now avoids as many uses of complex variables as possible and converts everything to sin/cos and sinh/cosh instead of complex exponentials. I would like to get a pde book that teaches the complex approach to pde's.

Which method does that book use?

thanks

-Scott
 
Spectre5 said:
Which method does that book use?

It focuses on the trigonometric perspective.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top