Zero Group Velocity: What Does it Mean?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of zero group velocity in an infinitely long mass-spring transmission line, described by the dispersion relation ω = √(4s/m) sin(kd/2). Participants clarify that zero group velocity indicates the presence of standing waves rather than stationary packets of traveling waves. The equation for current in a standing wave, I(x,t) = Imax[sin(kx)][cos(wt)], illustrates that the phase remains constant across positions, reinforcing the standing wave interpretation. This understanding is crucial for accurately discussing wave phenomena in physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave mechanics and dispersion relations
  • Familiarity with mass-spring systems and their dynamics
  • Knowledge of standing waves and traveling waves
  • Basic proficiency in trigonometric functions and their applications in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of group velocity in different wave systems
  • Explore the mathematical derivation of dispersion relations in various media
  • Investigate the relationship between phase velocity and group velocity
  • Learn about energy propagation in standing versus traveling waves
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and professionals interested in wave mechanics, particularly those studying the properties of mass-spring systems and wave behavior in various contexts.

Zarquon
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
An infinitely long "mass-spring transmission line", consisting of masses (m) connected by springs (spring constant s) obeys the following dispersion relation:

ω = \sqrt{4s/m} sin(kd/2).

The group velocity is

dω/dk = d/2 \sqrt{4s/m} cos(kd/2).

What does zero group velocity "mean" for this system?

This is a question from an exam i took recently. The answer was that you'd get a standing wave, which doensn't make sense to me. My answer was that you'd get stationary packets of traveling waves (like this: http://www.falstad.com/dispersion/groupzero.html ) (whereas you can get standing waves at any frequency. I still think I'm right, so if someone here can shed some light I'll know whether I should start arguing with my professor.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To see why a pure standing wave has a zero phase velocity, let's look at the equation for the current, I, in a standing wave.

I(x,t)=Imax[sin(kx)][cos(wt)] ;where w is omega=2*pi*freq and 0 < kx < 180 degrees

At any time, t, the phase of the current is a constant, i.e. the phase of the current does not vary with position x as it does for a traveling wave. In a pure standing wave, the position, x, only affects the magnitude of the envelope of the current. Since the phase of the current is a constant over any 0-180 degrees, the difference in any two phase measurements at different locations along that 0-180 degree path is zero. Note that a phase delay of zero for a pure traveling wave would imply faster-than-light energy propagation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K